Hi Harry,
Not a Monmouthpedia issue, but I have two BotRequests outstanding:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bot_requests/Archive_44#Date_templates_in_infoboxes
As somebody who has nevwer been an arbitrator, functionary, or board member,
and as somebody whose real-life identity is on his userpage for all to see, I
thought I'd just chime in that I agree completely with Anthony and Richard.
I have personally spoken to at least two respected members of
This is a test message to see if I have the right of reply to some of the more
allegations made here, about me.
Edward___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK:
This email and subsequent emails on the list refere.
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimediauk-l/2012-January/006977.html
I object to the claim that I was banned from the project for on and off-wiki
harassment. If WMUK is going to make extreme claims like this, they should be
backed up
As someone who does attend real life events and who does edit under a
pseudonym, I'm rather grateful for those who've spoken up and are aware of
this issue.
I'm an admin on the English Wikipedia, so to some of the trolls at WR I
suppose I'm a target for outing.
As an admin I have done quite a
On 10 January 2012 19:05, WereSpielChequers werespielchequ...@gmail.comwrote:
As someone who does attend real life events and who does edit under a
pseudonym, I'm rather grateful for those who've spoken up and are aware of
this issue.
It's more than one issue, of course. The whole area of
On 9 January 2012 12:37, Richard Symonds
richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
All,
Several respected members of the Wikimedia community – and several members
of our charity – have approached us voicing their concerns about Edward
Buckner, an ex-Wikipedia user who was banned from the
On 10 January 2012 18:50, Edward at Logic Museum edw...@logicmuseum.com wrote:
This is a test message to see if I have the right of reply to some of the
more allegations made here, about me.
I have received your email, so yes, you can still post here. I would
ask that you keep your response
Hi all,
As a WMUK trustee, I'm finding this whole issue to be a serious dilemma. I'm
deeply committed to the 'open to all to participate and contribute' philosophy
for all of our activities, and find it very saddening that the WMUK board has
been put in the position where we have to ban
I don't think it's productive (or helpful) to have a discussion like this
on a public mailing list, and would ask that if people have comments on
this, that they be directed to i...@wikimedia.org.uk. Bear in mind that
everyone concerned is a real person, so we need to keep discussions like
this
Regarding my previous email (in which I may have inadvertently contradicted
Mike!), please defer to his views on this over mine.
Richard
On 10 January 2012 21:16, Michael Peel michael.p...@wikimedia.org.ukwrote:
Hi all,
As a WMUK trustee, I'm finding this whole issue to be a serious dilemma.
My apologies; I wasn't meaning to contradict Richard here. If this conversation
needs to be kept confidential due to privacy concerns, then using the
i...@wikimedia.org.uk address (emails to which are directed to OTRS rather than
solely to individuals) is also a good approach to take. I note
This is missing the point. This is all about a British Museum event I
signed up to attend some time ago, before the UKCC thing blew up. When other
involved persons signed up I had it on my 'to do' list to remove my
signature, conscious of the fact that it would have been embarrassing or
Symonds:
Bear in mind that everyone concerned is a real person, so we need to keep
discussions like this private to avoid anyone being outed, or accused of
misbehaviour, in a public forum.
Yes, bear in mind that I am a real person, and that your first email message
outed me, and accused me of
On 10 January 2012 22:21, Edward at Logic Museum edw...@logicmuseum.com wrote:
This is missing the point. This is all about a British Museum event I
signed up to attend some time ago, before the UKCC thing blew up. When other
involved persons signed up I had it on my 'to do' list to remove my
You don't keep your real name secret.
No, but then I don't expect it to be linked with serious charges such as
'routine outing', 'harassment' and so on. Just use your brain cells for
once.
Richard finished him email with For the Wikimedia UK Board of Trustees
so I
think it is very clear who
On 10 January 2012 22:33, Edward at Logic Museum edw...@logicmuseum.com wrote:
Symonds:
Bear in mind that everyone concerned is a real person, so we need to keep
discussions like this private to avoid anyone being outed, or accused of
misbehaviour, in a public forum.
Yes, bear in mind that I
It's difficult to see how you can expect to be taken seriously, having
not even the courtesy to refer to Richard by more than an unadorned
surname (the height of rudeness, as I'm sure you are aware), seeming
not to have read the email that explains who Richard was acting for
and apparently failing
On 10 January 2012 23:06, Edward at Logic Museum edw...@logicmuseum.com wrote:
It's difficult to see how you can expect to be taken seriously, having
not even the courtesy to refer to Richard by more than an unadorned
surname (the height of rudeness, as I'm sure you are aware), seeming
not to
On 10 January 2012 23:07, James Farrar james.far...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10 January 2012 23:06, Edward at Logic Museum edw...@logicmuseum.com
wrote:
It's difficult to see how you can expect to be taken seriously, having
not even the courtesy to refer to Richard by more than an unadorned
On 10 January 2012 23:58, michael west michaw...@gmail.com wrote:
has everybody lost sense? Either the foundation has lost all sense of
reasoning to post public alleged allegations or you are happy to feed
trolls. Police if you can find proof, a county court to make a
restraining order or let
I'm still awaiting clarification from the Board about whether they are
taking collective responsibility for the *wording* of the announcement here
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimediauk-l/2012-January/006977.html
..
And to clarify again, it's not the fact of a ban I am concerned
22 matches
Mail list logo
