https://docs.google.com/document/d/13Latat1Ri4n4RwhGM2-smUVLvaHxkYuvRd6kPDWTbGU/edit
A community member suggested I share this link with you.
I thought it would be a useful idea to highlight exactly what happened in
WMUK board and exec meetings regarding the issues around MonmouthpediA,
Jon,
You need permission to access this item.
You are signed in as *deryckc...@gmail.com*, but you don't have permission
to access this item. You can request access from the owner or choose a
different account.
*This* I call evil and should burn in wikihell ;)
Deryck
On 25 October 2012 13:07,
Sorry Deryck . My mistake in sharing a document that was simply a list of
where QR codes, MonmouthpediA and GibraltarpediA were mentioned in board
minutes. One person has a very strong objection and since it is all public
anyway and accessible through the board minutes I responded to that
person's
On 25/10/12 17:11, Jon Davies wrote:
One person has a very strong objection and since it is all public
anyway and accessible through the board minutes I responded to that
person's honest objections by withdrawing what is an incomplete document.
But, of course, the document could have been
Or somebody could trawl through the board minutes and make their own
summary.
--
Doug
On 25 October 2012 17:28, Gordon Joly gordon.j...@pobox.com wrote:
On 25/10/12 17:11, Jon Davies wrote:
One person has a very strong objection and since it is all public anyway
and accessible through the
Sorry, Jon, but if you'd put it on the wiki, it wouldn't have been (as much of)
an issue, because people can and will edit it. It's also more public and
doesn't require digging a URL out of an archive if somebody wanted to read it
in the future (I'm assuming transparency was the aim of creating
On 25 October 2012 17:47, HJ Mitchell hjmitch...@ymail.com wrote:
Sorry, Jon, but if you'd put it on the wiki, it wouldn't have been (as much
of) an issue, because people can and will edit it. It's also more public and
doesn't require digging a URL out of an archive if somebody wanted to read
Could you fill in the gaps and republish? It would be good to get the
bits of the story that aren't in the public minutes included too. All
this information is going to need to be collated for the independant
reviewer anyway, so it might as well be published.
On 25 October 2012 16:17, Jon Davies
I am afraid we don't have anyone with the time to redo that at the moment.
If anyone wants to volunteer go ahead and put it in a wiki!!!
The main criticisms of the googledoc version was that it did not go back
far enough to include the Derby Museum work and that there may be reports
to the
No. I'm not sure what gave you that impression, but I apologise if I was
ambiguous. I don't know any more than you do.
Harry Mitchell
http://enwp.org/User:HJ
Phone: 024 7698 0977
Skype: harry_j_mitchell
From: Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com
To: HJ
On 25/10/12 18:59, Jon Davies wrote:
They will in any case being going back to zero and creating their own
chronology.
Jon.
Like Pol Pot?
Gordo
___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
11 matches
Mail list logo
