2009/8/28 Gordon Joly :
> Well, Mailman is a piece of code, and all the data is raw text.
> Suggest "only list members can view the archive" if you are really worried.
That'd break deep links all over the place.
In this case I'd suggest not worrying about it unless and until the
Daily Mail
At 20:55 +0100 26/8/09, David Gerard wrote:
>2009/8/26 Andrew Turvey :
>
>> You're absolutely right - posting snips is ok, whole articles isn't. I
>> apologise and wont do it again!
>> Just out of interest, can we delete posts from the archive?
>
>
>Not easily. It basically requires a dev to go
2009/8/26 Andrew Turvey :
> You're absolutely right - posting snips is ok, whole articles isn't. I
> apologise and wont do it again!
> Just out of interest, can we delete posts from the archive?
Not easily. It basically requires a dev to go in and do it. They
regard this as a substantial PITA ..
2009/8/26 Paul Williams :
> I was merely stating that your logic is flawed. We aren't claiming any
> ownership of posts to this list, or content ownership. It's just being
> reposted as a convienience.
Copyright isn't about claiming ownership, it is about copying, hence
the name. If you copy someo
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Brian McNeil
wrote:
> Both this list and wikien-l are public. To repost a substantial portion
> of a news website’s article on either of these mailing lists is a copyright
> violation.
>
Not necessarily; not if it's for the purposes of criticism or review, or for
To: wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Daily Mail on Flagged Revisions
I was merely stating that your logic is flawed. We aren't claiming any
ownership of posts to this list, or content ownership. It's just being
reposted as a convienience.
2009/8/26 Brian M
> Sent: Wednesday, 26 August, 2009 13:46:27 GMT +00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland,
> Portugal
> Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Daily Mail on Flagged Revisions
>
>
>
Both this list and wikien-l are public. To repost a substantial portion of a
news website’s article on e
org] *On Behalf Of *Paul Williams
> *Sent:* 26 August 2009 13:48
> *To:* wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Daily Mail on Flagged Revisions
>
>
>
> Under that logic, posting the link is a copyright violation as it does not
> belong to us.
>
>
imediauk-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Paul
Williams
Sent: 26 August 2009 13:48
To: wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Daily Mail on Flagged Revisions
Under that logic, posting the link is a copyright violation as it does not
belong to us.
2009/8/26 Brian McNeil
Bot
Under that logic, posting the link is a copyright violation as it does not
belong to us.
2009/8/26 Brian McNeil
> Both this list and wikien-l are public. To repost a substantial portion
> of a news website’s article on either of these mailing lists is a copyright
> violation.
>
>
>
>
>
> Brian
Both this list and wikien-l are public. To repost a substantial portion of a
news website's article on either of these mailing lists is a copyright
violation.
Brian.
- Forwarded Message -
From: "Andrew Turvey"
To: "English Wikipedia"
Sent: Wednesday, 26 August, 2009 13:20:00 GMT +
11 matches
Mail list logo
