Sorry if my answer is off-topic but if metadata are stored in WIkidata, is it
really needed to create index pages to store the same data as Wikidata?
As I see the things, we'll have bibliographical metadata on Wikidata (title,
author, date of publication...) and data related to proofreading
@aarti: sometimes some books/text/documents are born-digital.
Think about all the scientific literature, or Phd thesis. These files (if
cc-by/sa licensed) could be stored in Wikisource, and be useful for the
wikicommunity.
We already have some means to link those text to their source (with a URL).
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Thomas PT thoma...@hotmail.fr wrote:
Sorry if my answer is off-topic but if metadata are stored in WIkidata, is
it really needed to create index pages to store the same data as Wikidata?
As I see the things, we'll have bibliographical metadata on Wikidata
You're right Aubrey nevertheless while promoving a user friendly interface
the result is that data and wiki code is extremely difficult to use as a
clean data base. Think only to wiki markup and the simple trick to mark
bold and italic text with apostophes very user friendly, but something
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 12:16:54 +0530, Aarti K. Dwivedi
ellydwivedi2...@gmail.com wrote:
A slighly off-topic question: Even if we modify the extension to
proofread
books which do not have scans( I am assuming books that were born
digital
), against what
will these books be proofread?
I am not
