Re: [Wikisource-l] Discourse for Wikisource mailing list

2016-01-19 Thread Sam Wilson
I'm amazed -- a non-mediawiki idea for discussion! ;) I reckon it'd be worth a try. People who don't want to use the web interface can still just post and reply via email. And I like the idea of non-threaded disucssion... it works really well on all the sites I've used it on. --Sam On

Re: [Wikisource-l] Discourse for Wikisource mailing list

2016-01-19 Thread John Mark Vandenberg
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 3:46 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote: > I hate Discourse because it doesn't work without JavaScript. Every time I > end up on a discourse website I end up crying. > > Last time I checked, it also didn't have particularly good export features. > I thought

[Wikisource-l] Discourse for Wikisource mailing list

2016-01-19 Thread Andrea Zanni
Luis Villa, from WMF, asks if there is a list that wants to try Discourse: https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2016-January/081244.html Discourse is a (great) software for discussion, and it could be very useful for giving order to the many mailing lists that we have in the

Re: [Wikisource-l] Discourse for Wikisource mailing list

2016-01-19 Thread Nahum Wengrov
I vote for it. I'd be happy to serve as gunea pig :P On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Andrea Zanni wrote: > Luis Villa, from WMF, asks if there is a list that wants to try Discourse: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2016-January/081244.html > >

Re: [Wikisource-l] Discourse for Wikisource mailing list

2016-01-19 Thread Federico Leva (Nemo)
I hate Discourse because it doesn't work without JavaScript. Every time I end up on a discourse website I end up crying. Last time I checked, it also didn't have particularly good export features. I thought I had added to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Internet_forum_software but