I'm amazed -- a non-mediawiki idea for discussion! ;)
I reckon it'd be worth a try. People who don't want to use the web
interface can still just post and reply via email. And I like the idea
of non-threaded disucssion... it works really well on all the sites I've
used it on.
--Sam
On
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 3:46 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo)
wrote:
> I hate Discourse because it doesn't work without JavaScript. Every time I
> end up on a discourse website I end up crying.
>
> Last time I checked, it also didn't have particularly good export features.
> I thought
Luis Villa, from WMF, asks if there is a list that wants to try Discourse:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2016-January/081244.html
Discourse is a (great) software for discussion, and it could be very useful
for giving order to the many mailing lists that we have in the
I vote for it. I'd be happy to serve as gunea pig :P
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Andrea Zanni
wrote:
> Luis Villa, from WMF, asks if there is a list that wants to try Discourse:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2016-January/081244.html
>
>
I hate Discourse because it doesn't work without JavaScript. Every time
I end up on a discourse website I end up crying.
Last time I checked, it also didn't have particularly good export
features. I thought I had added to
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Internet_forum_software but