One thing that I find disappointing is that the number of texts without
scans
still increases at en.ws (see the graph). In fact, it even increased at
a rather
alarming pace recently, if we balance the amount of new text created with
our capability to proofread it.
This suggests that the en.ws
2010/10/4 ThomasV thoma...@gmx.de
However, texts without scans are *harmful* to Wikisource.
..
Wikisource will not be trustable until we stop accepting texts without
scans.
And no matter how virtuous some subdomains are, I think that the reputation
of Wikisource as a whole strongly
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 6:12 AM, ThomasV thoma...@gmx.de wrote:
One thing that I find disappointing is that the number of texts without
scans
still increases at en.ws (see the graph). In fact, it even increased at
a rather
alarming pace recently, if we balance the amount of new text created
2010/10/5 John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Klaus Graf klausg...@googlemail.com wrote:
2010/10/5 John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com:
However, texts without scans are *harmful* to Wikisource.
I long for the day when the vast majority of our texts are based on
