Re: [Wikisource-l] Standardize ProofreadPage namespaces, again

2014-10-20 Thread Wiki Billinghurst 
Fully agree with Thomas's points.

Find the right person within WMF to whom we need to talk. Get the
defaults determined by them, and plugged into their configs.  Then
work with them to move sites to the config, fix up filters, etc. Bite
size.

I would suggest that on this matter we would be best to approach
someone like Rob Lanphier to get someone as a contact.

Regards, Billinghurst

On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Thomas Tanon  wrote:
> Yes, it's a small detail for Wikisourcerors but not for tech people because 
> it requires to update a lot of rows in the database. So, I think that the 
> concertation should be done more with system administrators than with 
> Wikisourcerors.
>
> As 250/252 are the default ids for Page/Index namespaces and are dedicated to 
> ProofreadPage they should be used.
>
> About the other namespaces, they are not managed specifically by an extension 
> so the context is not exactly the same. I believe that this point should be 
> raised only after the changes for Page/Index are done.
>
> Thomas
>
>> Le 20 oct. 2014 à 09:07, Nicolas VIGNERON  a 
>> écrit :
>>
>>
>> 2014-10-20 2:51 GMT+02:00 Ricordisamoa :
>> About this RFC, John Vandenberg agreed to use the 250 / 252 pair for Page 
>> and Index namespaces, respectively.
>> Is it wise to just go ahead and request changing one site at a time? What 
>> are your wikis' general opinions about this?
>>
>> Not sure but I think that this change is important for technichal people and 
>> in the same time, it's probably a small detail for the wikisorcerors. Isn't 
>> it ? If it is, we should go ahead.
>>
>> What about the other namespaces ? (like I asked in March)
>>
>> Cdlt, ~nicolas
>> ___
>> Wikisource-l mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
>
>
> ___
> Wikisource-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l

___
Wikisource-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l

Re: [Wikisource-l] Standardize ProofreadPage namespaces, again

2014-10-20 Thread Thomas Tanon 
Yes, it's a small detail for Wikisourcerors but not for tech people because it 
requires to update a lot of rows in the database. So, I think that the 
concertation should be done more with system administrators than with 
Wikisourcerors.

As 250/252 are the default ids for Page/Index namespaces and are dedicated to 
ProofreadPage they should be used.

About the other namespaces, they are not managed specifically by an extension 
so the context is not exactly the same. I believe that this point should be 
raised only after the changes for Page/Index are done.

Thomas

> Le 20 oct. 2014 à 09:07, Nicolas VIGNERON  a 
> écrit :
> 
> 
> 2014-10-20 2:51 GMT+02:00 Ricordisamoa :
> About this RFC, John Vandenberg agreed to use the 250 / 252 pair for Page and 
> Index namespaces, respectively.
> Is it wise to just go ahead and request changing one site at a time? What are 
> your wikis' general opinions about this?
> 
> Not sure but I think that this change is important for technichal people and 
> in the same time, it's probably a small detail for the wikisorcerors. Isn't 
> it ? If it is, we should go ahead.
> 
> What about the other namespaces ? (like I asked in March)
> 
> Cdlt, ~nicolas
> ___
> Wikisource-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l


___
Wikisource-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l

Re: [Wikisource-l] Standardize ProofreadPage namespaces, again

2014-10-20 Thread David Cuenca 
My impression is that nobody is going to care about it as long as it
doesn't break anything. I would say that the best way to proceed would be
to set up a date for an initial migration test with a small wikisource by
sending them a notification in advance, and then repeat the procedure with
the rest.

Cheers,
Micru

On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 2:51 AM, Ricordisamoa 
wrote:

>  About this RFC
> ,
> John Vandenberg agreed to use the 250 / 252 pair for Page and Index
> namespaces, respectively.
> Is it wise to just go ahead and request changing one site at a time? What
> are your wikis' general opinions about this?
>
> ___
> Wikisource-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
>
>


-- 
Etiamsi omnes, ego non
___
Wikisource-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l

Re: [Wikisource-l] Standardize ProofreadPage namespaces, again

2014-10-20 Thread Nicolas VIGNERON 
2014-10-20 2:51 GMT+02:00 Ricordisamoa :

>  About this RFC
> ,
> John Vandenberg agreed to use the 250 / 252 pair for Page and Index
> namespaces, respectively.
> Is it wise to just go ahead and request changing one site at a time? What
> are your wikis' general opinions about this?
>

Not sure but I think that this change is important for technichal people
and in the same time, it's probably a small detail for the wikisorcerors.
Isn't it ? If it is, we should go ahead.

What about the other namespaces ? (like I asked in March)

Cdlt, ~nicolas
___
Wikisource-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l

[Wikisource-l] Standardize ProofreadPage namespaces, again

2014-10-19 Thread Ricordisamoa 
About this RFC 
, 
John Vandenberg agreed to use the 250 / 252 pair for Page and Index 
namespaces, respectively.
Is it wise to just go ahead and request changing one site at a time? 
What are your wikis' general opinions about this?
___
Wikisource-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l