Brion Vibber wrote:
Last week some of the background batch jobs were reorganized to run
under a less privileged user account, a good security practice.
Unfortunately the log files the batch jobs logged to didn't have their
ownership updated, so the batch jobs were unable to actually run,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Aryeh Gregor simetrical+wikil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Uwe Baumbach u.baumb...@web.de wrote:
after our upgrade to 1.14 we see at one category page:
Aryeh Gregor wrote:
Part of the problem is that the measure of job queue length we really
care about is what was the last job executed?, not how many jobs
are in the queue?. If we added a job_timestamp column and put an
index on it, we could replace (or supplement) the cruddy poor-quality
Daniel Friesen wrote:
Wait... MediaWikians? If we're MediaWikians, then are the users on
MediaWiki.org MediaWiki.orgians? Nowait... aha, it's MediaWiki.organs!
/me goes to see if he can find a way to get the .organs .tld created...;
/humor
No, MediaWikians would be the people at
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 8:20 PM, Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I'm not sure what good a complaining bot would do, any more than a
complaining user which we seem to have plenty of. Deleting the jobs was
not a solution, and can't really be repeated without breaking things.
There's
Hello,
In several Tex-implementations, Euro-sign (€) can be created by \euro,
\EURO \texteuro or \EUR.
This isn't implemented in Mediawiki jet - but several WP-users have been
asking for it.
Could anyone please do this?
Best Regards,
Michi
--
Michael F. Schönitzer
Mail: mich...@schoenitzer.de
Aryeh Gregor simetrical+wikil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Aryeh Gregor
simetrical+wikil...@gmail.com wrote:
I misunderstood the problem, evidently. I thought it was a one-off
thing due to software bugs the sysadmins didn't know about. It seems
it's more like a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
after upgrade to 1.14 we suffer from empty parts in print preview and
print output at only some pages!
It works only with IE7, FF and other IE versions print well.
Is this a known thing?
Empty part (white area) seems to start right
Andreas Meier andreasmeie...@gmx.de wrote in message
news:4997d645.8050...@gmx.de...
Hello,
the current dump building seem to be dead and perhaps should be killed
by hand.
Reported: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17535
___
On 2/17/09 8:33 AM, Russell Blau wrote:
Rotem Lissroteml...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:499a7134.5090...@gmail.com...
Brion Vibber wrote:
Last week some of the background batch jobs were reorganized to run
under a less privileged user account, a good security practice.
Unfortunately
Brion,
You Rock!!!
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Are there any plans of MediaWiki migrating from GPLv2 to GPLv3? If so, will
GPLv2 still be supported in future release?
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
On 2/17/09 11:34 AM, Trond Olsen wrote:
Are there any plans of MediaWiki migrating from GPLv2 to GPLv3? If so, will
GPLv2 still be supported in future release?
We have no particular plans to update to GPLv3 at this time.
Any particular interest in us converting or not in the future?
-- brion
It was in regard to if you're mixing in GPLv2 compatible sourcecode and then
later will be unable to receive security updates if MediaWiki becomes GPLv3
only.
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Brion Vibber br...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On 2/17/09 11:34 AM, Trond Olsen wrote:
Are there any plans
Most GPLed code is GPL version #, or later. That's what MediaWiki is,
so even if a move to GPLv3 is made anything specifying the , or later
which all the MW extensions using GPL in svn should be, then that code
can still be used because the , or later allows the code to be used
under GPLv3
I see now that the different sourcecode mentions GPL version #, or later.
I'm only using the webservices API so misunderstood the COPYING file which
only says GPLv2, but that's only a reference for GPLv2.
Thanks for the answers.
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Daniel Friesen
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Trond Olsen tolse...@gmail.com wrote:
It was in regard to if you're mixing in GPLv2 compatible sourcecode and then
later will be unable to receive security updates if MediaWiki becomes GPLv3
only.
You would in any event be able to receive and apply security
17 matches
Mail list logo
