Gregory Maxwell gmaxwell at gmail.com writes:
I don't know how to figure out how much it would 'cost' to have human
contributors spot embedded penises snuck into transcodes and then
figure out which of several contributing transcoders are doing it and
blocking them, only to have the bad user
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Andrew Garrettagarr...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I can possibly poke this tomorrow, must have slipped through my
fingers on Bug Friday :)
Well it was assigned to you and you unassigned it from yourself...
-Robert Rohde
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 8:20 PM, Ilmari Karonennos...@vyznev.net wrote:
Aryeh Gregor wrote:
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Gregory Maxwellgmaxw...@gmail.com wrote:
In other cases the gif tends to be larger, loads slower, etc. They
can be converted to PNG losslessly, so you should probably do
Michael Dale mdale at wikimedia.org writes:
* We are not Google. Google lost what like ~470 million~ last year on
youtube ...(and that's with $240 million in advertising) so total cost
of $711 million [1]
How much of that is related to transcoding, and how much to delivery? You seem
to be
Hello,
I'm sure this question has already been asked, but I can't find the answer.
I checked and my password is transmitted in clear text when I connect to my
Wikipedia account.
As an admin on a project, I feel very guilty to connect to my account on an
unsecured public wifi : I'm afraid my
Plyd wrote:
Hello,
I'm sure this question has already been asked, but I can't find the answer.
I checked and my password is transmitted in clear text when I connect to my
Wikipedia account.
As an admin on a project, I feel very guilty to connect to my account on an
unsecured public wifi
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:26 PM, Victor Vasilievvasi...@gmail.com wrote:
Plyd wrote:
Hello,
I'm sure this question has already been asked, but I can't find the answer.
I checked and my password is transmitted in clear text when I connect to my
Wikipedia account.
As an admin on a project, I
If somebody is interested, I wrote an extension for embedding (the upcoming)
Google waves in MediaWiki as a tag extension:
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:GoogleWave
If someone has a wave developer sandbox account I'd be glad if that person would
help me test the extension a bit more
On Sun, August 2, 2009 14:25, Ilmari Karonen wrote:
Gregory Maxwell wrote:
(2) you're using gif transparency and are obsessed with compatibility
with old IE. Scaling doesn't tend to work really well with binary
transparency.
By the way, forgot to mention this earlier, but this is actually a
Going back a bit in the thread history,
Ilmari Karonen wrote:
Also, Commons alone has almost a hundred thousand existing GIF files.
Converting them all to PNG would be a significant job, especially since
changing the format (and thus the suffix) means that they can't just be
reuploaded
K. Peachey wrote:
Its https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/LANGUAGE
CODE/wiki/Main_Page so for you wanting the french one it will be
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/fr/wiki/Main_Page
As it says on the insecure login:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Neil Harrisuse...@tonal.clara.co.uk wrote:
William Allen Simpson wrote:
K. Peachey wrote:
Its https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/LANGUAGE
CODE/wiki/Main_Page so for you wanting the french one it will be
I am working on the tests in ../phase3/maintenance/tests. I have found 2
problems (one of which may be only locally relevant). When I follow the logic
initiated in run-tests.php (which according to the target in the Makefile seems
to be the initiator of the tests) there are a lot of includes,
That is, the tests in ../phase3/tests.
--- On Mon, 8/3/09, dan nessett dness...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: dan nessett dness...@yahoo.com
Subject: [Wikitech-l] Is there any evidence that the tests in
phase3/maintenance/Tests ever worked?
To: wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Date: Monday, August
Google's cost is probably more on the distribution side of things ...
but I only found a top level number not a break down of component costs.
At any rate the point is to start exploring distributing costs
associated with large scale video collaboration. In that way I target
developing a
On 8/3/09 11:02 AM, dan nessett wrote:
I am working on the tests in ../phase3/maintenance/tests. I have
found 2 problems (one of which may be only locally relevant). When I
follow the logic initiated in run-tests.php (which according to the
target in the Makefile seems to be the initiator of
On 8/3/09 10:56 AM, Neil Harris wrote:
I've noticed that images such as the sitelogo in the login page linked
above are still served via HTTP, even when going through the secure
server. This causes Firefox to regard the whole page as potentially
compromised by unencrypted content, and it
The code that starts the tests is in PHPUnit (which is required to run
these tests) and is triggered by the line require( 'PHPUnit/TextUI/
Command.php' ); in run-tests.php.
Cheers!
Alexandre Emsenhuber
Le 3 août 09 à 20:06, dan nessett a écrit :
That is, the tests in ../phase3/tests.
---
make test just uses run-test.php as a command for the all target. However, I
have them running (although some fail).
--- On Mon, 8/3/09, Brion Vibber br...@wikimedia.org wrote:
From: Brion Vibber br...@wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] Is there any evidence that the tests in
Thanks. It turns out (something I discovered through a series of odd
coincidences) that TextUI/Command.php used to execute
PHPUnit_TextUI_Command::main at the bottom. This was removed some time ago so
the PHPUnit_TextUI_Command class could be extended (by including the file for
that purpose).
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Micke Nordinmickew...@gmail.com wrote:
If somebody is interested, I wrote an extension for embedding (the upcoming)
Google waves in MediaWiki as a tag extension:
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:GoogleWave
If someone has a wave developer sandbox account
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Michael Dalemd...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Look back 2 years and you can see the xiph communities blog posts and
conversations with Mozilla. It was not a given that Firefox would ship
with ogg theora baseline video support (they took some convening and had
to do
2009/7/17 David Gerard dger...@gmail.com:
The ZFS bug manifests when the file system is (a) very full (b)
getting lots of writes. The block allocation algorithm uses up all the
CPU trying for perfection rather than adequacy. So system CPU goes
through the roof and the system turns to
If the Google Wave Fedaration Protocol is really all its cracked up to
be and becomes a properly open XMPP extension maintained by the IETF
then it could be good to support it at the level of the back end along
with the database classes...
Magnus Manske wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 4:07 PM,
yea would have to be opt in. Would have to have controls over how-much
bandwidth sent out... We could encourage people to enable it by sending
out a the higher bit-rate / quality version ~by default~ for those that
opt-in.
--michael
Ryan Lane wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Michael
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Brion Vibber br...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Once we have a cleaner interface for hitting the general pages (without
the 'secure.wikimedia.org' crappy single host)
I'm curious...what will this cleaner interface look like? Will we be
able to connect securely through
perhaps if people create a lot of voice overs ~Kens burns~ effects on
commons images with the occasional inter-spliced video clip with lots of
back and forth editing... and we are constantly creating timely
derivatives of these flattened sequences that ~may~ necessitate such a
system..
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:56 PM, Michael Dalemd...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Also will hack in adding derivatives to the job queue where oggHandler
is embed in a wiki-article at a substantial lower resolution than the
source version. Will have it send the high res version until the
derivative is
28 matches
Mail list logo
