Thanks everyone who replied to my post.
I have proposed to change $wgSitename to ウィキペディア in Japanese
Wikipedia. A few users oppose itself. The half of users support
changing not the prefix of project namespace but only site's name, while
others support changes of both $wgSitename and project
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 9:14 AM, mizusumashi mizusuma...@coda.ocn.ne.jp wrote:
I have proposed to change $wgSitename to ウィキペディア in Japanese
Wikipedia. A few users oppose itself. The half of users support
changing not the prefix of project namespace but only site's name, while
others support
On 9/22/09 6:19 PM, Tim Starling wrote:
I've been working on a rewrite of the script loader and a
reorganisation of the JS2 stuff. I'd like to delay 1.16 until that's
in and tested. Brion has said that he doesn't want Michael Dale's
branch merge reverted, so as far as I can see, a schedule
Aryeh Gregor wrote:
I've been meaning to investigate this, but haven't found the time yet.
Have you come up with a minimal test case, or filed a bug with
Mozilla? I'd be willing to look at this if I get the time, but I
don't know how soon I will get the time, so it would help if someone
On 9/22/09 6:19 PM, Tim Starling wrote:
Siebrand Mazeland wrote:
Hola,
I just created https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20768 (Branch
1.16) and Brion was quick to respond that some issues with js2 and the
new-upload stuff need to be ironed out; valid concerns, of course.
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 9:14 AM, mizusumashi mizusuma...@coda.ocn.ne.jp
wrote:
I have proposed to change $wgSitename to ウィキペディア in Japanese
Wikipedia. A few users oppose itself. The half of users support
changing not the prefix of project namespace but only site's name, while
others
stevertigo wrote:
See https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18793 .
Note that ウィキペディア is not the canonical term, so people may not
want to provide such functionality. ;-|
-Stevertigo
Your answer is completely unrelated to mizusumashi request, which would
have no problem to be
2009/9/23 Platonides platoni...@gmail.com:
stevertigo wrote:
See https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18793 .
Note that ウィキペディア is not the canonical term, so people may not
want to provide such functionality. ;-|
-Stevertigo
Your answer is completely unrelated to mizusumashi
Platonides platoni...@gmail.com:
Your answer is completely unrelated to mizusumashi request, which would
have no problem to be fulfilled (assuming there's community consensus).
Don't confuse people with your own war (aka. bug 18793).
Hm. You are right. The tokens befuddled me.
-Stevertigo
I would add that I am of course open to reorganization and would happily
discuss why any given decision was made ... be it trade offs with other
ways of doing things or lack of time to do it differently / better.
I also add that not all the legacy support and metavid based code has
been
Yaron Koren wrote:
Hi everyone,
Part of the Wikipedia Usability Initiative is a project to create a system
whereby template calls are hidden (minimized, really) for most users on the
edit page, and when users do want to edit template calls, they can do so via
a form instead of editing the
I like the XML way of resolving this problem but I think it MediaWiki
has a bigger task to do.
Restructure the wiki language, XML-ize the language completely.
Forms and attributes will have a place in this WikiXML-definition.
Pages can be constructed from one or more XML-sources.
XML-source, or
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 4:37 PM, apri a.vd.wiel a.vd.w...@apri.nl wrote:
I like the XML way of resolving this problem but I think it MediaWiki
has a bigger task to do.
Restructure the wiki language, XML-ize the language completely.
Forms and attributes will have a place in this
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 7:54 PM, Robert Rohde raro...@gmail.com wrote:
Wikis are supposed to be easy to edit.
Wikitext is not easy to edit. It's incredibly confusing and
intimidating to any normal person. The only thing that would be easy
to edit is something WYSIWYG-based. And AFAICT, the
On 9/23/09 4:54 PM, Robert Rohde wrote:
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 4:37 PM, apri a.vd.wiela.vd.w...@apri.nl wrote:
I like the XML way of resolving this problem but I think it MediaWiki
has a bigger task to do.
Restructure the wiki language, XML-ize the language completely.
Forms and
Updates are coming back for LocalisationUpdate and ProofreadPage
extensions, which we tested then pulled Tuesday due to performance problems.
Roan's redone LU to store the message updates in serialized files
instead of the database, which we can sync locally to web servers and
should perform
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Robert Rohde raro...@gmail.com wrote:
Wikis are supposed to be easy to edit. Maybe I am misunderstanding
your intent, but XML-ize everything sounds like an approach that would
make it much harder for novice editors to figure out what they are
doing. XML tends
* Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com [Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:18:17 +1000]:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Robert Rohde raro...@gmail.com
wrote:
Wikis are supposed to be easy to edit. Maybe I am misunderstanding
your intent, but XML-ize everything sounds like an approach that
would
make it
18 matches
Mail list logo
