As I mentioned in a prior email, I have been converting
UsabilityInitiative/* extensions to work with ResourceLoader, and in the
process removing their dependency on UsabilityInitiative.php. Some of
these extensions were not really using any functionality in
UsabilityInitiative.php, so their
Dan Nessett wrote:
On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 23:42:08 +0200, Platonides wrote:
You load originaldb.objectcache, retrieve the specific configuration,
and switch into it.
For supporting many sumyltaneous configurations, the keyname could have
the instance (whatever that cookie is set to) appended,
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Trevor Parscal tpars...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I'm hoping these extensions, especially WikiEditor and Vector can be
examples of how to make use of ResourceLoader in extensions. Please
note: if you are working on code that is aimed at deployment this year,
you
Trevor Parscal wrote:
I'm hoping these extensions, especially WikiEditor and Vector can be
examples of how to make use of ResourceLoader in extensions. Please
note: if you are working on code that is aimed at deployment this year,
you should not depend on ResourceLoader. We hope to have it
On 9/20/10 1:35 PM, Platonides wrote:
Trevor Parscal wrote:
I'm hoping these extensions, especially WikiEditor and Vector can be
examples of how to make use of ResourceLoader in extensions. Please
note: if you are working on code that is aimed at deployment this year,
you should not depend
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 22:32:24 +0200, Platonides wrote:
Dan Nessett wrote:
On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 23:42:08 +0200, Platonides wrote:
You load originaldb.objectcache, retrieve the specific configuration,
and switch into it.
For supporting many sumyltaneous configurations, the keyname could
have
Chad wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Trevor Parscal tpars...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
I'm hoping these extensions, especially WikiEditor and Vector can be
examples of how to make use of ResourceLoader in extensions. Please
note: if you are working on code that is aimed at deployment this
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 6:07 PM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
I think nearly everyone agrees that most of this should be in core. Saying
so is trolling, though.
Don't see how it's trolling. But then again, maybe I should
defer to your expertise in the area.
-Chad
Chad wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 6:07 PM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
I think nearly everyone agrees that most of this should be in core. Saying
so is trolling, though.
Don't see how it's trolling. But then again, maybe I should
defer to your expertise in the area.
I don't
Aryeh Gregor wrote:
Implying that particular groups of developers aim to suppress
particular technical opinions, without naming the developers or giving
any supporting evidence, is definitely trolling.
You think calling specific individuals out (getting personal) would
_improve_ matters?
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 4:01 PM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Quite a few people are under the impression that MediaWiki 1.17 will be
released in October or November of this year.
I don't think there's been many public references to this, but that is
more or less the timeframe many of us
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Rob Lanphier ro...@robla.net wrote:
I don't think there's been many public references to this, but that is
more or less the timeframe many of us have discussed. There is at
least one public reference here:
I think someone (RobLa) is planning on populating these areas of the
wiki as more meetings take place - so I'm not sure we should be so
critical of the number of links in [[Meetings/Release]] - but yeah,
you've got a fair point, if we are going to be keeping meeting notes in
a public place
Le lundi 20 septembre 2010 à 17:08 -0700, Trevor Parscal a écrit :
I think someone (RobLa) is planning on populating these areas of the
wiki as more meetings take place - so I'm not sure we should be so
critical of the number of links in [[Meetings/Release]] - but yeah,
you've got a fair
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Trevor Parscal tpars...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I sometimes wonder if we are better at talking about things than doing
them. How easy would it be to just add a link the [[Meetings]] and be
done with it. Yet, here we all are typing away about it... Not sure if
this
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Aryeh Gregor
simetrical+wikil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Rob Lanphier ro...@robla.net wrote:
The goal, as I recall, was branching October 15 or thereabouts, with
first beta in November, and a release sometime after that (perhaps as
Rob Lanphier wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 4:01 PM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Quite a few people are under the impression that MediaWiki 1.17 will be
released in October or November of this year.
I don't think there's been many public references to this, but that is
more or less
17 matches
Mail list logo
