On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 3:16 AM, Daniel Werner
wrote:
> Right now I am implementing a new option (as part of
> https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36425) for which I'd like
> to
> use a html element with options. Right now
> MediaWiki always generates a list of selectboxes instead of t
We used to send an email to wikitech-l every time we approved new
Subversion committers, but now that we've switched to Git, I don't do
that anymore. We've welcomed at least a hundred new people to our
developer community since the Git switch two months ago, and you can see
most of them at https:
"Khorn (WMF)" posted a comment on Wikimedia.r1762.
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/Wikimedia/1762#c32817
Commit summary for Wikimedia.r1762:
Setting a dynamically generated variable to prevent notices. See r1761.
Khorn (WMF)'s comment:
Where is this used?
_
On 23/05/12 19:16, Daniel Werner wrote:
> Right now I am implementing a new option (as part of
> https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36425) for which I'd like to
> use a html element with options. Right now
> MediaWiki always generates a list of selectboxes instead of that when using
>
"Jpostlethwaite" posted a comment on Wikimedia.r1764.
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/Wikimedia/1764#c32816
Commit summary for Wikimedia.r1764:
Updated error handling. See r1763.
Jpostlethwaite's comment:
This is not really error handling.
I changed the variables to pull the de
"Jpostlethwaite" posted a comment on Wikimedia.r1763.
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/Wikimedia/1763#c32815
Commit summary for Wikimedia.r1763:
Updated parser to handle new log format. Added $customFilterScores handling.
Jpostlethwaite's comment:
I am going to update how the def
On 23 May 2012 18:16, Daniel Werner wrote:
> Right now I am implementing a new option (as part of
> https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36425) for which I'd like
> to
> use a html element with options. Right now
> MediaWiki always generates a list of selectboxes instead of that when u
Right now I am implementing a new option (as part of
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36425) for which I'd like to
use a html element with options. Right now
MediaWiki always generates a list of selectboxes instead of that when using
the HTMLMultiSelectField class. We are talking abo
"Aaron Schulz" posted a comment on MediaWiki.r115377.
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/115377#c32814
Commit summary for MediaWiki.r115377:
dir_exists isn't a php function!!
Aaron Schulz's comment:
Should have replaced it with is_dir() :)
___
Make it report to #wikimedia-labs pls and #huggle
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Antoine Musso wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Under 20%, I have decided to give the wikibugs IRC bot some love.
>
> That bot is a script processing bugzilla emails notification sent
> publicly to the wikibugs-l mailing list. I
Le 23/05/12 14:00, Jeroen De Dauw a écrit :
> Hey,
>
> Is it possible to push to a branch other then the default one on gerrit
> using git review?
I think the branch is given as an argument to git-review, aka:
git review [BRANCH]
--
Antoine "hashar" Musso
___
Hello,
Under 20%, I have decided to give the wikibugs IRC bot some love.
That bot is a script processing bugzilla emails notification sent
publicly to the wikibugs-l mailing list. It crafts colorful IRC messages
which are then relayed by ircecho to #mediawiki.
I have made wikibugs to recognize t
"Hashar" posted a comment on MediaWiki.r115407.
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/115407#c32813
Commit summary for MediaWiki.r115407:
adding basic .gitignore
Hashar's comment:
I use 'git svn' and that code is going to be migrated to git anyway.
_
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 8:00 AM, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Is it possible to push to a branch other then the default one on gerrit
> using git review?
>
> This is needed when you want to have more then one branch on which you have
> reviewed code, or if you want different levels of review.
I too have been wondering how to do this.
My main use cases are
1) when I want to easily share something experimental with others (my
current process involves pushing for review and then having to
remember to -1 it)
2) when I want to collaborate with someone (without the ability to
push to gerrit)
Hey,
Is it possible to push to a branch other then the default one on gerrit
using git review?
This is needed when you want to have more then one branch on which you have
reviewed code, or if you want different levels of review. For example if
you want a novice committer play around with an exten
AFAIK most of production servers run ubuntu. Maybe there are some
running Slakware, no idea.
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Chad wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Petr Bena wrote:
>> At some point I did appreciate some of your notifications, maybe you
>> could continue sending these af
17 matches
Mail list logo
