Excerpts from wangfeng wangfeng's message of Tue Aug 07 20:49:12 -0400 2012:
> Thank you! Your work will great help to me.
To me, too. I will stop working on my program that scrapes the
web interface to create accounts, then!
https://github.com/paulproteus/create-wiki-account
-- Asheesh.
__
hello,
I have configured (and patched) richeditor in my mediawiki 1.19.1:
require_once("$IP/extensions/WYSIWYG/WYSIWYG.php");
$wgGroupPermissions['*']['wysiwyg'] = TRUE;
$wgDefaultUserOptions['riched_use_toggle'] = 1;
$wgDefaultUserOptions['riched_start_disabled'] = 1;
$wgDefaultUserOptions['rich
Hello everyone,
You're invited to the IRC office hours with the Localisation team[1] at the
Wikimedia Foundation.
Date: 2012-08-15
Time: 16.30 UTC
Venue: #wikimedia-office
Agenda:
1. Universal Language Selector update.
2. Language teams.
3. Q & A
For more logistical info and time conversion lin
Thank you! Your work will great help to me.
2012/8/7 Tyler Romeo
> Awesome. In that case I'll put it on my project list. Depending on how free
> I am, I should have something in the next week or two.
>
> *--*
> *Tyler Romeo*
> Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
> Major in Computer Sc
On 08/06/2012 08:03 PM, Tomás Vírseda wrote:
> Anyway I think it is useful and I'd like to share this project in
> Internet. Which is the best strategy?
> I know that I can export all my pages into a file. But is there
> any idea/extensions about this issue?
I'm interested in anything you find out
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Liangent wrote:
> Also Lua modules?
Good point!
Helder
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 3:57 AM, Raylton P. Sousa
wrote:
> I'm also interested in a reply
>
> 2012/8/6 Helder .
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> According to some pages on mediawiki.org[1][2], it seems that wiki is
>> going to be
>> a central repository for gadgets which will be shared with WMF projects
>> (and oth
I'm also interested in a reply
2012/8/6 Helder .
> Hi!
>
> According to some pages on mediawiki.org[1][2], it seems that wiki is
> going to be
> a central repository for gadgets which will be shared with WMF projects
> (and other projects using MediaWiki).
>
> I would like to know if there is an
>
>
> The goal would be to lure experienced TDD devs in by focusing the event on
> testing, make them work with the community during a weekend on the code
> base, existing test, writing tests, etc. and mentor others along the
> way. (I'm still convinced that giving it a cool, flashy, name doesn't h
Hi Al, Bawolff, Lydia, Marcin, and thanks for your feedbacks and exchanges!
I was away for a few days, so I'll try to summarize what's have been said
and what it makes me think about tech outreach at wikipedia.
Bawolff said:
> it just seems that often outreach focuses on people outside the
> Wik
Someone managed to cancel our demo in WebEx. Apologies.
The demo link is
https://wikimedia.webex.com/wikimedia/j.php?ED=182512652&UID=1294182757&RT=MiMyMg%3D%3D
The demo will start in 5 minutes or less.
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Siebrand Mazeland (WMF)
wrote:
> You are invited to the Loca
> Mhm. I like the idea of function supersession. Basically, I just don't
> think we should call a function deprecated unless it actually is indeed
> deprecated, i.e., no longer used anywhere in the core. Theoretically, a
> function that is deprecated in the core should not show any warnings
> whats
Awesome. In that case I'll put it on my project list. Depending on how free
I am, I should have something in the next week or two.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@gmail.com
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 9:04
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Tyler Romeo wrote:
> Hmm, if there is actually any interest, I might try and work on the account
> registration API.
I'm sure there's plenty of interest! From what I know, at least Mobile
Team is interested in them (enabling account creation in apps).
--
Yuvi Pan
Mhm. I like the idea of function supersession. Basically, I just don't
think we should call a function deprecated unless it actually is indeed
deprecated, i.e., no longer used anywhere in the core. Theoretically, a
function that is deprecated in the core should not show any warnings
whatsoever when
>I don't think this is a very good idea at all. The real problem has to do
with
>the definition of a deprecated feature. If a feature has been deprecated,
then
>it should no longer be used (at least not in the core).
>
>Inventing soft deprecation for features that have been superseded but have
yet
Hmm, if there is actually any interest, I might try and work on the account
registration API.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@gmail.com
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:29 AM, wangfeng wangfeng <
wangfeng.v1.1
I don't think this is a very good idea at all. The real problem has to do
with the definition of a deprecated feature. If a feature has been
deprecated, then it should no longer be used (at least not in the core).
Inventing soft deprecation for features that have been superseded but have
yet to be
Indeed:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/wikitech/249632
Helder
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Krinkle wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
>
>> Hey,
>>
>> This is something I've come across several times before when deprecating
>> functions: people want dif
Hey,
Didn't we solve this already by being able to pass a version to
> wfDeprecation() and allowing users to set $wgDeprecationReleaseLimit to
> hide/show from whatever cut-off point they desire?
>
This seems to coarse - people still get mad when adding a wfDeprecated(
__METHOD__, '1.20' ), even
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
> Hey,
>
> This is something I've come across several times before when deprecating
> functions: people want different behaviour with regard to the warnings they
> get. Typically what people want can be split into two groups:
>
>
Didn't we sol
>Hey,
>
>This is something I've come across several times before when deprecating
>functions: people want different behaviour with regard to the warnings they
get.
>Typically what people want can be split into two groups:
>
>Weak deprecation: The function is documented as being deprecated but no
>w
Hi,
is there any special advice for searching in mediawiki instances using solr?
The only thing I found
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:SolrStore
seemed to be quit special for SMW?
We already run solr for other projects and it would be nice to include our wiki
http://genwiki.genealogy
Hey,
This is something I've come across several times before when deprecating
functions: people want different behaviour with regard to the warnings they
get. Typically what people want can be split into two groups:
Weak deprecation: The function is documented as being deprecated but no
wfDepreca
Thank you .
I will consider it.
2012/8/7 Christopher Wilson
> It seems like it would make more sense to just use a central
> authentication system to support both the Wiki and the other services.
> There are extensions and plugins for LDAP and other authentication
> methods.
>
> On Mon, Aug 6, 2
It seems like it would make more sense to just use a central
authentication system to support both the Wiki and the other services.
There are extensions and plugins for LDAP and other authentication
methods.
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:58 PM, wangfeng wangfeng
wrote:
> Thank you.
> So do you mean t
26 matches
Mail list logo