On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 7:02 AM, Jon Robson jdlrob...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a bug open for this yet? If not there probably should be...
(apologies if there is.. scanning through I cannot see one)
In terms of supporting non-standard files - there is no reason why to get
an obscure size
On 19 September 2012 09:20, aude aude.w...@gmail.com wrote:
If anything, I think in the download button / dialog in Commons, we should
have an option to allow user to choose image of any size to download, in
addition to the preset choices. :)The thumbnails can be temporary I
suppose, and
On 19 September 2012 09:25, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
The Commons reuse guide [1] notes that hotlinking thumbnails is
allowed, but it's a terrible idea and you should either store the
image locally or use InstantCommons (which works wonderfully).
[1]
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Srikanth Lakshmanan (WMF)
slakshma...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hello everyone,
You're invited to the IRC office hours with the Localisation team[1] at
the Wikimedia Foundation.
Date: 2012-09-19
Time: 16.30 UTC
Venue: #wikimedia-office
Agenda:
1. Project
I would like to open some discussion about
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40329
This bug is about the fact that we currently do a 'partial' transform of
the HTML5-invalid attribute 'align'.
We all agree that this is bad, what we need to figure out is what to do
next:
1: Disable
1: Disable the transform and output the align attribute even though it's
not valid HTML5. Solve validness later.
2: Remove the attribute from HTML5 and 'break' the content. Fix by users
(or bot).
3: Disable HTML5, correct the content of the wiki's (possibly with a bot)
and remove the attribute in
Hi Srikanth
I'd like to participate in this meeting but am new to my IRC reader
(Colloquy) ... hope to chat with all of you soon.
Cheers
Scott
http://scottmacleod.com
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Srikanth Lakshmanan (WMF)
slakshma...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 12:14
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Derric Atzrott
datzr...@alizeepathology.com wrote:
1: Disable the transform and output the align attribute even though it's
not valid HTML5. Solve validness later.
2: Remove the attribute from HTML5 and 'break' the content. Fix by users
(or bot).
3: Disable
On Sep 18, 2012, at 5:07 PM, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 September 2012 00:09, Steven Walling steven.wall...@gmail.com wrote:
Following up on what I said previously about wanting to build on top of
this, there are some usability enhancements proposed at bug #40307.
On Sep 19, 2012, at 2:57 AM, Helder . helder.w...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Jon Robson jdlrob...@gmail.com wrote:
On Commons it seems to take 5 seconds to disappear which is too long as at
this point I'm wondering how to dismiss it.
I think the time should depend on
I'm glad this area is getting a lot of interest - unfortunately I haven't
been able to keep up on this thread but I wanted to give a suggestion
related to adding icons.
It's reasonable to take an option that provides a URL to an icon image, but
we should have a common (customizable per skin and
Already in progress.
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Design/Agora_Icon_Set
They'll eventually be in the Agora library as sprites.
--
Munaf Assaf
On Wednesday, September 19, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Trevor Parscal wrote:
I'm glad this area is getting a lot of interest -
Maybe I was unclear.
I'm not suggesting we make these icons so much as we make the notification
system use them by name.
As in:
mw.notify( {
// This is bad
'icon': '
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/32/check-icon.svg'
/* other options here */
} );
vs.
mw.notify( {
I wasn't clear; that's exactly what we're doing in the Agora CSS library.
--
Munaf Assaf
On Wednesday, September 19, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Trevor Parscal wrote:
Maybe I was unclear.
I'm not suggesting we make these icons so much as we make the notification
system use them by name.
As
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Munaf Assaf mas...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I wasn't clear; that's exactly what we're doing in the Agora CSS library.
You are adding an icon feature to me.notify in the Agora CSS library?
I know the answer is no, we are creating icons that can be used for that
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Derk-Jan Hartman
d.j.hartman+wmf...@gmail.com wrote:
We all agree that this is bad, what we need to figure out is what to do
next:
1: Disable the transform and output the align attribute even though it's
not valid HTML5. Solve validness later.
2: Remove the
Agreed, let's do #1. It sounds like this isn't our only HTML5
validity problem. We shouldn't punish our readers with
poorly-formatted content in the name of technical correctness.
Rob
Long term though I still think we should aim for technical correctness. Which
is why I advocate #4 as well.
Hi all,
here's our weekly list of Wikidata review items. Due to the hands-on
meeting last week we refrained from sending it earlier. Now that most
should be back home, I wanted to give an overview of the open
items before our telco tomorrow.
* ContentHandler. This one is seriously blocking us
Maybe I'm doing it wrong, but it seems the way to request thumbnails has
changed, at least for SVGs.
For example, for
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3e/Flag_of_New_Zealand.svg
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 1:20 AM, aude aude.w...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 7:02 AM, Jon Robson jdlrob...@gmail.com wrote:
In terms of supporting non-standard files - there is no reason why to get
an obscure size e.g. 224px you could get for example the 240px image and
resize
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Jon Robson jdlrob...@gmail.com wrote:
At the danger of derailing/forking the conversation...
Your answer makes sense, thank you. I didn't want to kill the
discussion either...
Can we agree on this:
If the primary target are app developers then
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Quim Gil quim...@gmail.com wrote:
If the primary target are app developers then
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/API:Main_page + improvements is probably
a better target. http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Developer_hub
See full reasoning at
I think we should point to a developer hub but the current one needs to be
massively revised!
On Sep 19, 2012 4:51 PM, Rob Lanphier ro...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Quim Gil quim...@gmail.com wrote:
If the primary target are app developers then
I really wish I could just got to http://developer.wikimedia.org/
and/or http://developer.wikipedia.org
--tomasz
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Jon Robson jdlrob...@gmail.com wrote:
I think we should point to a developer hub but the current one needs to be
massively revised!
On Sep 19,
Hello all,
As recently announced [1], WMF will move forward in creating a
Wikimedia travel project based on community request and support.
We’re currently in discussions with the Wikivoyage community, who’ve
expressed interest in joining Wikimedia’s project family as part of
this launch. We’re
Without wanting to take away from the value of this suggestion, I'll just
point out that there's also not a link to Become an Editor either.
(Create an account doesn't really count, lots of people have accounts who
never edit.) I'll be the first to admit I'm in awe of the brain power on
this list,
I'm afraid that my opposition is rather frivolous, but is the ratio of
developers to laymen enough to justify adding the extra burden? It seems
some others have noted that if we include a developer hub, we can't stop
there. I could propose a research hub, a librarian hub, a photographer hub.
A
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Mono monom...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm afraid that my opposition is rather frivolous, but is the ratio of
developers to laymen enough to justify adding the extra burden? It seems
some others have noted that if we include a developer hub, we can't stop
there. I
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
+1 for redirecting developers.wikimedia.org and
developer.wikimedia.org to
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Developer_hub as well.
Submitted in
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#q,Ifa3c5e9988da162b2dde65e66bcb180f96161783,n,z
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:53:54 -0700, Denny Vrandečić
denny.vrande...@wikimedia.de wrote:
Hi all,
here's our weekly list of Wikidata review items. Due to the hands-on
meeting last week we refrained from sending it earlier. Now that most
should be back home, I wanted to give an overview of the
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Sumana Harihareswara suma...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
... And to help new developers discover various cross-Wikimedia tech
projects, there is https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_developer_hub.
but the conversation seems to be zeroing in on
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Rob Lanphier ro...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Quim Gil quim...@gmail.com wrote:
If the primary target are app developers then
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/API:Main_page + improvements is probably
a better target.
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Making the open source nature of our projects more easily discoverable
is a Good Thing.
Indeed, but mixing public APIs with 1001 open source possibilities
tends to make more happy the smaller circle of insiders and free
33 matches
Mail list logo
