Re: [Wikitech-l] [Wikimediauk-l] AdBlock Plus wants to protect you from a malicious website, namely Wikimedia UK

2012-11-26 Thread John Vandenberg
I received the same error when I visited http://incubator.wikimedia.org/ , suggesting that I wanted to go to incubator.wikipedia.org , and asking if I wanted to block wikimedia.org On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote: On 24 November 2012 16:41, Tom

Re: [Wikitech-l] [Wikimediauk-l] AdBlock Plus wants to protect you from a malicious website, namely Wikimedia UK

2012-11-26 Thread Andre Klapper
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote: On 24 November 2012 16:41, Tom Morris t...@tommorris.org wrote: Does someone want to work out how to complain to the relevant parties? Is there no facility to report false positives on their website?

[Wikitech-l] Extensions to include in the 1.21 tarball/installer

2012-11-26 Thread Federico Leva (Nemo)
TL;DR: Please add feedback to https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Suggestions_for_extensions_to_be_integrated Since MediaWiki 1.20 has been released, a discussion (opened by hexmode) is ongoing on how to make our release notes better so that users understand what improvements there are and why

Re: [Wikitech-l] Apply for the FOSS Outreach Program for Women internships

2012-11-26 Thread Quim Gil
Hi, a brief OPW status update a week before the deadline for candidate submissions: We have 14 candidates listed at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Outreach_Program_for_Women#Candidates We are still being contacted by new prospective candidates almost on a daily basis. About half of the

Re: [Wikitech-l] Please take this survey about new contributors

2012-11-26 Thread Quim Gil
Just a reminder: the official deadline for the survey about new contributors is TOMORROW, although as late comers we will et some extra days until the end of the month (FRIDAY). The survey info page says that it takes 20 minutes to complete it. fwiw I did it in rather less time. On

Re: [Wikitech-l] There are maps for wikivoyage?

2012-11-26 Thread Tomasz Finc
The mobile team is picking the OSM buildout back on its roadmap. Stay tuned for updates. --tomasz On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 1:38 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote: On 25 November 2012 21:36, Raylton P. Sousa raylton.so...@gmail.com wrote: I keep thinking that (particularly) the

Re: [Wikitech-l] Standardizing highest priority in Bugzilla

2012-11-26 Thread Andre Klapper
On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 02:33 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: == Proposal == Proposing the following definitions for Priority: * highest: Needs to be fixed as soon as possible, a week at the most. A human assignee should be set in the Assigned to field. * high: Should be fixed within the next

Re: [Wikitech-l] Proposed new WMF browser support framework for MediaWiki

2012-11-26 Thread Tomasz Finc
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 12:50 PM, James Forrester jforres...@wikimedia.orgwrote: … which seems to be a little harsh on the mobile and tablet fronts, and overly- generous on the MSIE side given their exceptional costs to support per %age of users, but not too terrible. I worry less about it

Re: [Wikitech-l] Proposed new WMF browser support framework for MediaWiki

2012-11-26 Thread Tomasz Finc
Correction. I was looking at the total Other/Unknown. Opera is actually 4.66% --tomasz On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Tomasz Finc tf...@wikimedia.org wrote: On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 12:50 PM, James Forrester jforres...@wikimedia.org wrote: … which seems to be a little harsh on the

Re: [Wikitech-l] Proposed new WMF browser support framework for MediaWiki

2012-11-26 Thread Luke Welling
Something that seems to be being partially considered in these models is browser shares that are growing or shrinking. For instance it would make more sense to me to support IE10 than IE7 even if IE7 has a far greater market share this month. If significant work is needed for IE7, it might have

Re: [Wikitech-l] Standardizing highest priority in Bugzilla

2012-11-26 Thread James Forrester
On 26 November 2012 10:51, Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org wrote: On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 02:33 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: == Proposal == Proposing the following definitions for Priority: * highest: Needs to be fixed as soon as possible, a week at the most. A human assignee should be

Re: [Wikitech-l] Standardizing highest priority in Bugzilla

2012-11-26 Thread Arthur Richards
Thanks for tackling this, Andre! I don't think 'importance' should necessarily map to a timeframe for resolution - at least not one that is set in stone. Different teams/products use bugzilla to varying degrees and in different ways, and a reasonable time frame resolving a 'high' priority bug may

[Wikitech-l] Help identifying false new contributors

2012-11-26 Thread Quim Gil
Hi, I'm planning to release the November community metrics report [1] next week. In order to have more accurate stats on new contributors, can you help checking these names? It would be great if you are/know the false new contributor and you would claim the new commits to your Ohloh username.

Re: [Wikitech-l] Help identifying false new contributors

2012-11-26 Thread Platonides
On 26/11/12 23:14, Quim Gil wrote: MediaWiki https://www.ohloh.net/p/mediawiki/contributors?highlight_key=first_checkintime_span=30+days S Page, Amire80, Anomie, MarkAHershberger, Asher, Tpt, burthsceh, Stephan Gambke. MarkAHershberger is not new, but hexmode.

Re: [Wikitech-l] Help identifying false new contributors

2012-11-26 Thread James Forrester
On 26 November 2012 14:14, Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org wrote: Parsoid https://www.ohloh.net/p/Parsoid/contributors?highlight_key=first_checkintime_span=30+days Iweilling Luke was indeed new to Parsoid. :-) VisualEditor

Re: [Wikitech-l] Help identifying false new contributors

2012-11-26 Thread Brad Jorsch
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org wrote: MediaWiki https://www.ohloh.net/p/mediawiki/contributors?highlight_key=first_checkintime_span=30+days S Page, Amire80, Anomie, MarkAHershberger, Asher, Tpt, burthsceh, Stephan Gambke. I guess gerrit uses Anomie as the name

Re: [Wikitech-l] Help identifying false new contributors

2012-11-26 Thread Quim Gil
On 11/26/2012 03:20 PM, Brad Jorsch wrote: On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org wrote: MediaWiki https://www.ohloh.net/p/mediawiki/contributors?highlight_key=first_checkintime_span=30+days S Page, Amire80, Anomie, MarkAHershberger, Asher, Tpt, burthsceh, Stephan Gambke.

Re: [Wikitech-l] Standardizing highest priority in Bugzilla

2012-11-26 Thread Rob Lanphier
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Arthur Richards aricha...@wikimedia.org wrote: I'm not suggesting we necessarily go with these definitions, but rather offering these as an example of potential meanings for the different priorities. To me this is a much more useful approach than trying to

Re: [Wikitech-l] Standardizing highest priority in Bugzilla

2012-11-26 Thread James Forrester
On 26 November 2012 17:25, Rob Lanphier ro...@wikimedia.org wrote: On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Arthur Richards aricha...@wikimedia.org wrote: I'm not suggesting we necessarily go with these definitions, but rather offering these as an example of potential meanings for the different

[Wikitech-l] Quick show of hands: Adam Hyde guest talk

2012-11-26 Thread Erik Moeller
Adam Hyde from the booktype project will be in San Francisco in the week of 12/10-12/14, so could potentially do an in-person brown bag with remote participation on Thursday 12/13 in our usual weekly chat time slot. booktype is doing some interesting open source work to create book quality

Re: [Wikitech-l] outreach program for women

2012-11-26 Thread Sumana Harihareswara
On 11/22/2012 01:55 AM, Navdeep Bagga wrote: On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Sumana Harihareswara suma...@wikimedia.org wrote: Hi, Navdeep. Thanks for writing to us. I agree with Quim that you should go ahead and contact the mentors who are mentoring the specific activities you're

Re: [Wikitech-l] Standardizing highest priority in Bugzilla

2012-11-26 Thread Krinkle
On Nov 27, 2012, at 2:36 AM, James Forrester jforres...@wikimedia.org wrote: On 26 November 2012 17:25, Rob Lanphier ro...@wikimedia.org wrote: Timeframes seem like a pretty good proxy for priority. If something is highest priority, and yet is not on track to be completed for several months,

Re: [Wikitech-l] Proposed new WMF browser support framework for MediaWiki

2012-11-26 Thread Martijn Hoekstra
On Nov 26, 2012 9:17 PM, Luke Welling lwelling lwell...@wikimedia.org@lwell...@wikimedia.org wikimedia.org lwell...@wikimedia.org wrote: Something that seems to be being partially considered in these models is browser shares that are growing or shrinking. For instance it would make more sense