Thanks Greg for the overview. 0–4 is fine, but there a couple premises I
question, which trigger a couple considerations/conjectures which may be
of use.
First, let's not call the wmfXX subpages release notes. They just are
lists of commits. As you noted, they are also created – by design –
On Mar 23, 2013 12:10 AM, John phoenixoverr...@gmail.com wrote:
I know Aaron has spent a lot of time on the job queue. But I have
several observations and would like some feedback. The current workers
apparently select jobs from the queue at random. A FIFO method would
make far more sense. We
On 22.03.2013 18:10, Thomas Gries wrote:
just one message, just arrived:
http://php.net/archive/2013.php#id2013-03-21-1
PHP 5.5.0 beta1 available 21-Mar-2013
The PHP development team announces the release of the first beta of PHP
5.5.0. This release is the first to include the Zend OPCache.
After going in details through all the proposals it turns out we only
have 3 project ideas listed at
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Summer_of_Code_2013#Project_ideas
The rest miss a mentor, a more solid justification of relevance and/or a
demonstration of interest from the communities they
Don't forget about the potentials of a priority based queue! (That being
said I actually have no idea what goes into our job queues; so can't say if
there's good candidates for priority based queuing.)
~Matt Walker
Wikimedia Foundation
Fundraising Technology Team
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 6:30
AFAIK we already do that for some entries, Reedy will know more, I
will let you investigate his mind for more knowledge on that.
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Matthew Walker mwal...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Don't forget about the potentials of a priority based queue! (That being
said I actually
