On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 9:52 PM, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 April 2013 22:24, phoebe ayers phoebe.w...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 April 2013 19:07, Lydia Pintscher lydia.pintsc...@wikimedia.de
wrote:
On
Risker,
You are right that it will undoubtedly get used as soon as it is available,
and it is unfortunate that it will presumably get deployed without any
agreement having been reached on wiki about how it should be used.
However, when it comes to an area like infoboxes, I think a lot of
Risker wrote:
Lydia, could you please point me to the discussion on *English Wikipedia*
where the community indicated an interest in deploying this software?
Infoboxes and sourcing to another website completely outside the control
of English Wikipedia is a rather big issue, and I would expect to
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 5:28 PM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Risker wrote:
Lydia, could you please point me to the discussion on *English Wikipedia*
where the community indicated an interest in deploying this software?
Infoboxes and sourcing to another website completely outside the
MZMcBride wrote:
I think the issue we're seeing here is that changes, particularly large
changes, often aren't socialized well.
I mention socialization of features as I'm not sure all of the context is
apparent here. There are brooding factions on the English Wikipedia over
infoboxes, apparently.
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 10:28 AM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Risker wrote:
Lydia, could you please point me to the discussion on *English Wikipedia*
where the community indicated an interest in deploying this software?
Infoboxes and sourcing to another website completely outside the
On 04/03/2013 04:19 PM, Quim Gil wrote:
Sure, but following this argument we could just have
dev.wikipedia.org, right?
All of the wikitech, wikimediafoundation, outrech and
other wikis together have fewer articles than the
English Wikipedia. All could fit on meta.wikimedia.org.
Unfortunately
In hewiki we had a discussion in village pump before phase II deployment
and there is a simple bureaucratic policy for converting templates to use
the new {{#property}} feature:
a discussion in Wikipedia:Village pump/templates for each template
conversion before actually adding {{#property}} for
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Eran Rosenthal eranro...@gmail.com wrote:
In hewiki we had a discussion in village pump before phase II deployment
and there is a simple bureaucratic policy for converting templates to use
the new {{#property}} feature:
a discussion in Wikipedia:Village
Hello all,
You can watch the iconathon here:
http://youtu.be/sei9SeoObJA
If you would like to participate in the hangout, please email me, Pau Giner
(pgi...@wikimedia.org) or Vibha Bamba (vba...@wikimedia.org).
Thanks!
Munaf
___
Wikitech-l mailing
Is anybody watching the bugs filed via this? I've already wontfixed four
myself...
--
Matma Rex
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Le 04/04/13 17:28, Max Semenik a écrit :
Yeah, but what if you need more than one global function? ;)
I would write a small class having static functions.
--
Antoine hashar Musso
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
On Fri, 05 Apr 2013 06:45:52 -0700, vita...@yourcmc.ru wrote:
You can't cache program state and loaded code like that in PHP. We
explicitly have to abuse the autoloader and develop other patterns to
avoid loading unused portions of code because if we don't our
initialization is unreasonably
On 04/06/2013 11:58 AM, Bartosz Dziewoński wrote:
Is anybody watching the bugs filed via this? I've already wontfixed four
myself...
Yes, we are. Don't worry, let the testing activity finish and the team,
QA and bugmeister will look at them.
--
Quim Gil
Technical Contributor Coordinator @
On 04/05/2013 03:01 PM, Isabel Gancedo wrote:
Everything seems to be working fine; jobs run a maximum warp and the queue
is becoming tiny.
Excellent. I see this line in the New features list from the Release
notes:
The Job system was refactored to allow for different backing stores
for
*I got the idea of this extension via the mailing list itself
*I plan on implementing a *pronunciation recording extension*
***More Details can be found out on
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Rahul21/Gsoc
*You Could Contact me on the IRC(Rahul_21) or email me back.
Thank You
Rahul Maliakkal
I fully agree with Robert and Phoebe in this matter. Wikidata is an option.
Requiring first to come up with rules on how to use Wikidata before it is
switched on simply won't work, because there is not sufficient interest and
experience for this discussion.
Or, put differently, the Wikidata
In case y'all missed this:
- Forwarded Message -
From: PRIVACY Forum mailing list priv...@vortex.com
To: privacy-l...@vortex.com
Sent: Saturday, April 6, 2013 3:10:01 PM
Subject: [ PRIVACY Forum ] French homeland intelligence threatens a volunteer
sysop to delete a Wikipedia Article
By the way, it would be lovely not to call communication like
nationalization... sometimes I see people coming to communities saying
they're socializing something and it feels weird. ;-) (Especially as
it's false good news.)
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/socialize
(transitive) To
On Apr 6, 2013 9:05 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
In case y'all missed this:
Subject: [ PRIVACY Forum ] French homeland intelligence threatens a
volunteer sysop to delete a Wikipedia Article
French homeland intelligence threatens a volunteer sysop to delete a
Wikipedia Article
20 matches
Mail list logo
