Currently we are experiencing problems when we try to query wikipedia.
Fetching content via the Wikipedia API can be a lot easier in our
opinion. The problem we have is that it is possible to fetch content via
the property rvsection, which will accept a value (number) which
represents the
refreshLinks.php[1] can fix that.
[1] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:RefreshLinks.php
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Daniel Barrett d...@vistaprint.comwrote:
I'm the original poster -- here is my real-world use case where a null
edit is required.
My wiki has a custom parser tag,
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 5:05 AM, Daniel Renfro dren...@vistaprint.comwrote:
Whilst upgrading to 1.22.5 from 1.21.8 I came across $wgUseVFormUserLogin
[1]. Form what I can tell this global directive is completely missing from
core. The docs on mw.org say it's in 1.22+, but I can't find any
Le 22/04/2014 22:45, Merlijn van Deen a écrit :
Hello all,
As the original wikibugs bot did not come back online today, the tasks of
wikibugs have now fully been taken over by a python re-implementation of
the same bot, running on Tool Labs.
snip
Source code is available at
On 22 Apr 2014, at 02:37, Lego KTM legoktm.wikipe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Justin Folvarcik jfolvar...@gmail.com
wrote:
function removeDuplicateLinks(){
..
}
if (wgAction == 'edit'){
mw.toolbar.addButton( {
imageFile: '
Yay!
--
Matma Rex
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Am I correct in assuming that adding a check for mw.toolbar will help
prevent the code from causing errors when in an edit view without a toolbar?
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 7:14 AM, Krinkle krinklem...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 Apr 2014, at 02:37, Lego KTM legoktm.wikipe...@gmail.com wrote:
On
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 3:48 AM, Daan Kuijsten daankuijs...@gmail.comwrote:
A better way for fetching content via an API is to assign a unique ID to a
section, a paragraph, a table, an image etc. This way we could simply fetch
a part of the content of wikipedia via this ID.
That doesn't
On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 09:48:17 +0200, Daan Kuijsten daankuijs...@gmail.com
wrote:
A better way for fetching content via an API is to assign a unique ID to
a section, a paragraph, a table, an image etc. This way we could simply
fetch a part of the content of wikipedia via this ID.
Such ids
Thanks Trevor!
When will such 'recommended fields' be available to use?
-
Yury Katkov
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Trevor Parscal tpars...@wikimedia.org wrote:
We are introducing recommended fields which will be automatically added
when the template is added. We already support
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Daniel Barrett d...@vistaprint.comwrote:
We modified the code for foobar to add a feature: autocategorizing.
[Now] if you visit an article Blat that
previously contained foobar, you will see it is properly categorized
at the bottom. However, if you visit the
'Wikitrack' started out from an idea that I had about tracking edits on
Wikipedia from mobile. I always felt that there's more to tracking edits
and their quality on Wikipedia. For one, we could zero-in on better
contributors than just going by the edit counts. And doing that for mobile
could be
On Apr 23, 2014 11:52 AM, Daniel Barrett d...@vistaprint.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Daniel Barrett d...@vistaprint.com
wrote:
We modified the code for foobar to add a feature: autocategorizing.
[Now] if you visit an article Blat that
previously contained foobar, you will
CC'ing mobile-l as i'm sure the'll be interested by this.
--tomasz
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Hari Prasad Nadig hpna...@gmail.com wrote:
'Wikitrack' started out from an idea that I had about tracking edits on
Wikipedia from mobile. I always felt that there's more to tracking edits
and
Hi all,
I have been accepted into the Google Summer of Code 2014 and will be
working on the Tools for mass migration of legacy translated wiki content
project [1].
As per the project timeline, I have drafted the requirements [2] for this
project after discussing with my mentors - Nikerabbit and
On 04/21/2014 01:55 PM, Sumana Harihareswara wrote:
Micru's Associated namespaces RfC is up for discussion this week.
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Architecture_meetings/RFC_review_2014-04-23
(We also have room for 1 more RfC to discuss.)
Micru said about
On 03/31/2014 06:14 PM, Sumana Harihareswara wrote:
On 02/26/2014 12:23 PM, Daniel Kinzler wrote:
I have just pushed a new version of the TitleValue patch to Gerrit:
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/106517.
I have also updated the RDF to reflect the latest changes:
Yes, it will ensure the code won't run if that particular toolbar isn't enabled.
And it is also a safe guard for backwards compatibility (since the API used to
have a different interface), and forwards compatibility (it might change).
Usually you wouldn't need such guard and instead use a
Good to know. Also, I must have read the wrong documentation when I went to
use addButton. Not sure where I got that callback parameter from. So
instead I just attached an event handler to the button on click, and now it
does what I want. Thanks for clearing up the confusion, Krinkle!
On Wed,
Hi,
you are invited to join us on the next Bugday:
Tuesday, April 29, 2014, 14:30 to 16:30UTC [1]
in #wikimedia-office on Freenode IRC [2]
We will be triaging Bugzilla tickets under the product MediaWiki and
the component General/Unknown [3].
Everyone is welcome to join, and no technical
20 matches
Mail list logo
