On 16/01/15 17:38, Bryan Davis wrote:
The solution to these issues proposed in the RFC is to create
independent services (eg Parsoid, RESTBase) to implement features that
were previously handled by the core MediaWiki application. Thus far
Parsoid is only required if a wiki wants to use
- Original Message -
From: Daniel Friesen dan...@nadir-seen-fire.com
On 2015-01-18 5:29 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
- Original Message -
From: James Forrester jforres...@wikimedia.org
Three quick examples of things on the horizon (I'm not
particularly saying
we'd actually
On 2015-01-18 5:29 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
- Original Message -
From: James Forrester jforres...@wikimedia.org
Three quick examples of things on the horizon (I'm not particularly saying
we'd actually do these for Wikimedia's use, but if you're going to ask
for straw man arguments…
- Original Message -
From: Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com
I've been saying for over a year now we should just drop the 1. from
the 1.x.y release versions. So the next release would be 25.0, 26.0,
etc etc.
Oh dear ghod, no. I already want to massacre the entire release management
- Original Message -
From: James Forrester jforres...@wikimedia.org
Three quick examples of things on the horizon (I'm not particularly saying
we'd actually do these for Wikimedia's use, but if you're going to ask
for straw man arguments… :-)):
- Get rid of wikitext on the
I don't think adding a couple more services is going to drastically alter the
current situation.
MediaWik core and most of the extensions actually only depend on php and mysql,
both are de facto standard included most in webhosting packages, which makes
MediaWiki to run (in theory) on a wide
*sigh* I was hoping the farmers had united
but good luck to the virtual farmers of ~85% men
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Gregory Varnum
gregory.var...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings,
Please join the Affiliations Committee in congratulating the MediaWiki
Farmers User Group on their
Anybody interested?
Il 30/12/2014 10:11, Ricordisamoa ha scritto:
Il 17/12/2014 17:57, Ricordisamoa ha scritto:
I've written a simple MediaWiki extension that uses an instance of
the W3C Validator service (via the Services_W3C_HTMLValidator
