On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
How about just converting those threads back to Wikitext, instead? That
script already exists, I've seen it used on Mediawiki. Will it mess up the
pages that have already been converted using that script?
Bottom line, it
LiquidThreads (LQT) has not been well-supported in a long time. Flow
is in active development, and more real-world use-cases will help
focus attention on the higher-priority features that are needed. To
that end, LQT pages at mediawiki.org will start being converted to
Flow in the next couple of
On 2015-03-16 7:55 PM, Gergo Tisza wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Daniel Friesen dan...@nadir-seen-fire.com
wrote:
Bitcoin is not untraceable.
An adversary capable enough to eavesdrop on dissidents' communication
making them need Tor should be capable of tracing the publicly
On 16 March 2015 at 21:20, Ryan Lane rlan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
How about just converting those threads back to Wikitext, instead? That
script already exists, I've seen it used on Mediawiki. Will it mess up
the
pages that
How about just converting those threads back to Wikitext, instead? That
script already exists, I've seen it used on Mediawiki. Will it mess up the
pages that have already been converted using that script?
Bottom line, it makes no sense to replace software that was considered
barely suitable when
At the end of the day, the key is communicating with communities to work
things out with them - and that may well have to happen on a
project-by-project basis. Finding a mid-size project with a very active
admin corps that would be willing to try out whatever you folks come up
with is probably a
Hi All,
I am Dibya Singh and I am applying for FOSS Outreachy 10. I have selected a
project from #possible-tech-projects list named One stop translation to
improve consistency for translation. I have been in contact with mentor
Niklas Laxström and Federico Leva alias for understanding the project
Fiayy!
So happy to hear this is happening :)
On 16 Mar 2015 17:52, Nick Wilson (Quiddity) nwil...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
LiquidThreads (LQT) has not been well-supported in a long time. Flow
is in active development, and more real-world use-cases will help
focus attention on the
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
How about just converting those threads back to Wikitext, instead? That
script already exists, I've seen it used on Mediawiki. Will it mess up the
pages that have already been converted using that script?
Bottom line, it
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Daniel Friesen dan...@nadir-seen-fire.com
wrote:
Bitcoin is not untraceable.
An adversary capable enough to eavesdrop on dissidents' communication
making them need Tor should be capable of tracing the publicly available
bitcoin transaction logs back from the
This has been merged now.
On Sat, 2015-02-21 at 18:27 +0100, hoo wrote:
Hi Everyone,
just wanted to quickly let you know that MediaWiki will verify that
extensions register all rights they define in $wgAvailableRights (or
using the UserGetAllRights hook).
To make sure your extension
Hi Krys,
On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 17:23 -0800, Krys Nu wrote:
I wish to express my interest in working on the above mentioned project. I
have the required technical skill -PHP- and I am willing tread new grounds.
I would love to discuss more about the project, what is really expected of
the
Nick Wilson (Quiddity) schreef op 2015/03/16 om 17:51:
LiquidThreads (LQT) has not been well-supported in a long time. Flow
is in active development, and more real-world use-cases will help
focus attention on the higher-priority features that are needed. To
that end, LQT pages at mediawiki.org
I fully upport and welcome this, but at least for Project:Support_desk you
should communicate this on this LQT board, too, that it will be converted (if
you didn't do hat already, i haven't looked now, because LQT ist terrible on
mobile :P). There are probably very active supporters, who
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Gergo Tisza gti...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Well, the obvious collateral is always money; and with bitcoin going
mainstream, untraceable money transfers are now accessible even to
nontechnical users (although I don't know Not sure if the mere act of
buying
I think pretty much anything is better than the current situation. I'd
support this proposal.
The timing is right too with the WMF vs NSA lawsuit just happening.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 1:29 AM, Arlo Breault abrea...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
I share Risker’s concerns here and limiting the
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Chris Steipp cste...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Setting up a proxy like this is definitely an option I've considered. As I
did, I couldn't think of a good way to limit the types of accounts that
used it, or come up with an acceptable collateral I could keep from the
On 2015-03-16 2:30 PM, Gergo Tisza wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Chris Steipp cste...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Setting up a proxy like this is definitely an option I've considered. As I
did, I couldn't think of a good way to limit the types of accounts that
used it, or come up with an
I share Risker’s concerns here and limiting the anonymity
set to the intersection of Tor users and established wiki
contributors seems problematic. Also, the bootstrapping
issue needs working out and relegating Tor users to second
class citizens that need to edit through a proxy seems less
than
19 matches
Mail list logo
