Sorry for breaking the thread with a serious post. ;)
While Andre or me possible cannot help reviewing the code of a 2 year old
patch, we are trying to help avoiding to run into such situations in the
first place. Check our plan to organize a Gerrit Cleanup Day [1] as a
possible beginning of a d
Thanks!
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Grace Gellerman
wrote:
> Don't recall any concerns re: Reading from today.
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Adam Baso wrote:
>
> > Grace, do you recall if any concerns were raised for Reading? My bad, we
> > had a department wide meeting, and I shoul
Don't recall any concerns re: Reading from today.
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Adam Baso wrote:
> Grace, do you recall if any concerns were raised for Reading? My bad, we
> had a department wide meeting, and I should have notified people.
>
> -Adam
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Grace
Grace, do you recall if any concerns were raised for Reading? My bad, we
had a department wide meeting, and I should have notified people.
-Adam
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Grace Gellerman
wrote:
> https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Scrum_of_scrums/2015-06-10
>
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Scrum_of_scrums/2015-06-10
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Brad Jorsch (Anomie) wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 7:29 AM, John Mark Vandenberg
> wrote:
>
>> If possible, could you compile a list of bots affected at a lower
>> threshold - maybe 1,000. That will give us a better idea of the scale
>> of bots operators that
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 7:36 PM, Brian Wolff wrote:
>> To really make this awesome we need structured data support for
>> Commons with Wikidata. We'll be making more progress on it in the
>> second half of this year but there is a lot to do.
>
> Sure, to really make that awsome, yeah you need wiki
>
> To really make this awesome we need structured data support for
> Commons with Wikidata. We'll be making more progress on it in the
> second half of this year but there is a lot to do.
>
Sure, to really make that awsome, yeah you need wikidata. But we are
far away from hitting the point where
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Gergo Tisza wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Brian Wolff wrote:
>
> > Additionally, from the help page, its not entirely clear about some of
> > the limitations. e.g. You can't do incategory:Foo OR intitle:bar.
> > regexes on intitle don't seem to work ove
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Brian Wolff wrote:
> You can't do incategory:Foo OR intitle:bar.
> regexes on intitle don't seem to work over the whole title, only word
> level tokens (I think, maybe? I'm a bit unclear on how the regex
> operator works).
>
>
intitle is word level though you can d
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 8:01 AM, MZMcBride wrote:
> I have two recurring thoughts about search lately, since you asked.
>
> First, multimedia search is absolutely horrible, basically non-existent.
> If you go to Wikimedia Commons and try its search functionality and then
> compare to any other med
In the next RFC meeting, we will discuss the following RFC:
* Create a proper command-line runner for MediaWiki maintenance tasks
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T99268
The meeting will be on the IRC channel #wikimedia-office on
chat.freenode.net at the following time:
* UTC: Wednesday 21:00
*
[x-posted announcement]
Hello,
A reminder that the online office hour hosted by the Wikimedia Language
Engineering team is happening later today at 14:30 UTC. You can join the
hangout or watch the session from:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/events/cuunke6rbmqpetvslv6jlakbhnc
Please note, due to th
On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 02:01 -0400, MZMcBride wrote:
> a list of a dozen features that are missing (search by file size,
> by color, by image file format, etc.).
Also see https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T101089 and
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T101087
--
Andre Klapper | Wikimedia Bugwrang
14 matches
Mail list logo
