Re: [Wikitech-l] Phabricator tag for bugs in local projects

A single gadgets project that just tracks an issue with any MediaWiki gadget out there is just going to create a completely useless mess. I think that to track an issue with a gadget in Phabricator, there should be at least one associated project for the specific gadget (i.e., not just a tag or com

Re: [Wikitech-l] Phabricator tag for bugs in local projects

Perhaps Engineering Community as well? Unlike Community Tech, CE has a manager and therefore perhaps more ability to address this sooner. Any comments, Quim? Thanks! Pine On Jul 15, 2015 10:16 PM, "Jon Robson" wrote: > I'm encountering a similar problem now - > https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/

Re: [Wikitech-l] Phabricator tag for bugs in local projects

I'm encountering a similar problem now - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T99361 On phabricator should there be a gadgets project? Community project? I hit this issue all the time and to me is the biggest flaw with the fact editors can introduce code. Templates/gadgets for me are hard to debug,

Re: [Wikitech-l] Phabricator tag for bugs in local projects

Perhaps a solution is to tag as something other than "invalid"; perhaps "downstream dependency"? Pine On Jul 15, 2015 9:28 PM, "Amir E. Aharoni" wrote: > Hi, > > In the past it happened to me a few times that I opened bugs about > something wrong that happened on a Wikimedia site, and it was clo

Re: [Wikitech-l] Phabricator tag for bugs in local projects

Yes, yes, a thousand times yes. We're tracking all sorts of nontechnical stuff in Phab too these days, there is no reason at all we should close out legit technical issues with site JS, CSS, Gadgets, templates, etc without actually doing something to help. -- brion On Jul 15, 2015 11:28 PM, "Amir

[Wikitech-l] Phabricator tag for bugs in local projects

Hi, In the past it happened to me a few times that I opened bugs about something wrong that happened on a Wikimedia site, and it was closed as invalid because the issue was not in MediaWiki code, but in a local gadget, style or template on that project. The bugs were actually fixed, but I'd like

Re: [Wikitech-l] Upcoming SyntaxHighlight_GeSHi changes

> On 15 jul. 2015, at 18:43, Nicolas Vervelle wrote: > > Hi, > > Is this related to the fact that some pages are now categorized in "Pages > with syntax highlighting errors > " > ? > How can we find what is wrong in t

Re: [Wikitech-l] Upcoming SyntaxHighlight_GeSHi changes

Hi, Is this related to the fact that some pages are now categorized in "Pages with syntax highlighting errors " ? How can we find what is wrong in the page ? I tried several things to fix Wikipedia talk:WPCleaner, but di

Re: [Wikitech-l] Users without a global SUL account will no longer be able to login

Wouldnt it be a lot better if we told the users it was SUL related? On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Legoktm wrote: > Hi, > > As part of concluding SUL finalization, users who do not have a global > SUL account will no longer be able to login. They will receive an error > message indicating tha

[Wikitech-l] Users without a global SUL account will no longer be able to login

Hi, As part of concluding SUL finalization, users who do not have a global SUL account will no longer be able to login. They will receive an error message indicating that their password is invalid. This should affect practically nobody. There are a few unattached accounts left (e.g. T98156) but t

Re: [Wikitech-l] Wikimedia authentication on an external website?

On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 4:33 AM, Paul Arzelier wrote: > We're trying to use the collections (a beta wikipedia feature) on a > wikimedia external website, http://wikijourney.eu, which delivers > wikipedia-driven tourist tours. > In order to use the collections' API, we need the user to log in his

Re: [Wikitech-l] Wikimedia authentication on an external website?

Hi, What about using OAuth[1] to get a specific scope of rights of the user? For Gather (the extension, that provides the collection feature) the view and edit watchlist rights _should_ be enough (I haven't tested it). That would be more accurate as requesting the user to enter the username and

[Wikitech-l] Wikimedia authentication on an external website?

Hi! We're trying to use the collections (a beta wikipedia feature) on a wikimedia external website, http://wikijourney.eu, which delivers wikipedia-driven tourist tours. In order to use the collections' API, we need the user to log in his wikipedia account, and it would be nice to have a log-in