-- which required users to be labelled either as staff or
non-staff -- a little tricky.
Harry
--
Harry Burt
User:Jarry1250
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
) if that's something people would use.
-Chad
This would be great, particularly if we can surface them in the
release notes, where having a bug number attached turns out to be a
really good heuristic for this is an important change you should take
a look at.
Harry
--
Harry Burt (User:Jarry1250
clear commit summaries regardless of whether or not they're directly
committing to core/master, if not overly time-consuming. This would make it
a lot easier for people like me who wade through the automated release notes
Thanks!
Harry
--
Harry Burt (User:Jarry1250)
[1] https://www.mediawiki.org/w
of years).
Harry
--
Harry Burt (User:Jarry1250)
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
I realise that many contributors are WMF staff, and many WMF staff
work a relatively predictable 5-day week, but the new changesets
graph still seems a little spiky to my eyes.
Given the +- 10 changesets range, how much confidence should I be
placing in these numbers?
Thanks,
Harry
--
Harry
: there are
simply far too many to properly remember.
Once again, thanks everyone and I hope to keep you posted over the
coming months about further progress.
Regards,
Harry
--
Harry Burt (User:Jarry1250)
[1] I think this is particularly worth flagging up because I can't be
the only student whose
authors of the
Translate extension, which TranslateSvg layers on top of.
I hope to have a live working demonstration wiki installation up and
running within the next fortnight, after phase 3 is complete. I'd love to
hear any comments either then or now :)
Thanks, Harry
-- Harry Burt (User:Jarry1250
Hey all.
As some of you may already know, I have a busy real-life period coming up
in the next two weeks. As such, I'm unable to write my regular Technology
Report [1] for the English Wikipedia-based (but cross-project) ''Signpost''
online newspaper. I know plenty of people on this list are
practice with regard to
softening the transition in order to avoid non-Gerrit-tracked extensions
breaking.
I've thrown up one idea at http://pastebin.com/Jw109j4a .
Any pointers appreciated,
Harry
--
Harry Burt (User:Jarry1250)
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
:)
Thanks everyone!
Harry
--
Harry Burt (User:Jarry1250)
WMF GSoC student
[1] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:TranslateSvg/2.0
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Magnus Manske wrote:
In continuation of the recent discussion, might this work for showing
SVGs directly in browsers that can do so, etc.?
Magnus
I would argue that SVGs are a poor use case here (a better one being
high-density JPGs such as those used by Retina displays).
Specifically,
Hey all,
thanks for your replies. Unfortunately I wasn't able to read them until
today, so the official GSoC proposal has now been sent off. That said,
I'm no less enthusiastic about reaching out to knowledgeable people
involved with translation, and, if necessary, adapting the way GSoC works
out
On 05/04/12 10:53, Daniel Friesen wrote:
I thought this might be problematic to have everyone install. But
thinking about it again. Gerrit is the one doing merges. If that can
handle the RELEASE-NOTES format that we uses. Then theoretically
installing it on the server gerrit uses and then
Hey all,
Now I have more of the details sorted out, I'd like to invite feedback on
my Google Summer of Code proposed project, entitled *TranslateSvg: Bringing
the translation revolution to Wikimedia Commons *.[1]. Obviously the
deadline for submissions is rapidly closing in, but comments would
Hey all.
I'm looking for comments regarding an extension I knocked up today and its
viability for Wikimedia wikis:
https://github.com/Jarry1250/TranslateSvg
The extension removes the need for duplicating a file (an administrative
nightmare) when you want to translate it. It does this by
Ariel T. Glenn wrote:
I think we finally have a complete copy from December 2007 through
August 2011 of the pageview stats scrounged from various sources, now
available on our dumps server.
Great news!
I do think there should be a note about the systemic under-reporting
that made statistics
Hey wikitech-l,
I finally got around to reading the August engineering report, which, as
ever, is a very useful read. However, one item did stick out to me:
[Visual editor] Ian Baker
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Raindrift investigated
and started to work on a chat system to be integrated
17 matches
Mail list logo