Thanks for the answers and the Phabricator comments!
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
No, of course it's not deprecated.
--
Bartosz Dziewoński
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Verdy_p (Philippe Verdy) is not a MediaWiki developer (or WMF employee), so
there is no need to pay attention to his bizarre claim that [[Link]]s is
deprecated (it isn't).
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 2:12 AM, Amir E. Aharoni <
amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il> wrote:
> I really, really don't think that i
I really, really don't think that it was ever _declared_ as deprecated, in
any RFC or major architecture document . If it was, I'd like to read where.
That said, in practice Visual Editor treats characters that come
immediately after links differently:
1. If the caret is at the end of link, but i
2016-07-27 10:48 GMT+03:00 Bináris :
> At https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T47126 Verdy_p wrote:
>
> "So I think that writing "[[Link]]s" (or "[[Target|Link]]s") instead of
> "[[Target|Links]]" (or "[[Link|Links]]") is just an old (deprecated) trick
> of MediaWiki used by (lazy) wiki redactors, we
At https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T47126 Verdy_p wrote:
"So I think that writing "[[Link]]s" (or "[[Target|Link]]s") instead of
"[[Target|Links]]" (or "[[Link|Links]]") is just an old (deprecated) trick
of MediaWiki used by (lazy) wiki redactors, we cannot recommand using it:"
I think this may
