Makes sense. IMHO most of the stuff I mentioned is just minor qualms. The
overall syntax is pretty nice, and I think it'd be a great idea to have
something like this.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com |
On 12-08-18 10:37 PM, Tyler Romeo wrote:
I think this is an awesome idea and I'd be willing to help on this.
I have a few questions about the page linked above though:
* Why don't we use foreign keys in MySQL?
We don't use them now so I didn't use them in the abstract table schema
types.
We've got a nice abstract query system but our table creation and
migrations are horrible. We re-write them for multiple database engines.
And as a result extensions need to do the same and often don't. Leading to
things being a mess for databases other than MySQL.
While I was doing the
Hey Daniel,
As far as I know this is something lying on a shelve somewhere (ie probably a
branch in core's svn, as, IIRC, Chad, was close I completing this once a year
or two ago.
--
Siebrand Mazeland
M: +31 6 50 69 1239
Skype: siebrand
Op 18 aug. 2012 om 19:52 heeft Daniel Friesen
We tried this before, and I'd love to see it happen. Take a look at the
abstract-schema branch in SVN for what we did.
-Chad
On Aug 18, 2012 1:53 PM, Daniel Friesen li...@nadir-seen-fire.com wrote:
We've got a nice abstract query system but our table creation and
migrations are horrible. We
I see the branch, but I don't see the code:
https://svn.wikimedia.org/viewvc/mediawiki/branches/abstract-schema/phase3/
It looks like someone just copied phase3 and then never actually changed
any code. I don't even see a syntax idea there.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire)
I think this is an awesome idea and I'd be willing to help on this.
I have a few questions about the page linked above though:
- Why don't we use foreign keys in MySQL?
- The word hack is used three times. That's probably an issue. ;)
- Is there a reason we're changing the default from
