Le mar 16/02/10 14:13, Jamie Morken jmor...@shaw.ca a écrit:
What is the benefit of the database dumps being archived/distributed in xml
format instead of sql format? Converting the xml to sql takes a long time
for big wiki's and people seem to have problems with this step, so why
isn't the
Hi!
Converting the xml to sql takes a long time for big wiki's and people seem to
have problems with this step, so why isn't the sql format available for
download instead of the xml format?
Our dumps are not 'sql dumps'. We assemble them from all the different parts
(memcached, multiple
On 2/16/10 7:03 AM, Jamie Morken wrote:
Ok, the simple question: how many people prefer XML or sql dumps?
I think we have a FAQ on this...
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Download#What_happened_to_the_SQL_dumps.3F
You *do* realize that such SQL dumps would have to be invented from
whole cloth
On 2/11/10 7:41 AM, emman...@engelhart.org wrote:
Almost one month ago I have reported a bug in mwdumper which seems to me to
be critical.
I simply can't user mwdumper with the itwiki XML dumps:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22137
I have extract the problematic part of the
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:34:41 -0800
From: Brion Vibber br...@pobox.com
Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] [mwdumper] new maintainer?
To: wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Message-ID: hlekvf$nl...@ger.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 2/16/10 7:03 AM, Jamie Morken
Le ven 12/02/10 01:52, Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.org a écrit:
emmanu
e...@engelhart.org wrote:
mwdumper is an almost mandatory tool to spread our
content and for this reason i wanted to
speak about that on the ML.
You might have to be more specific than that. It doesn't seem like
emman...@engelhart.org said:
Le ven 12/02/10 01:52, Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.org a écrit:
emman...@engelhart.org wrote:
mwdumper is an almost mandatory tool to spread our
content and for this reason i wanted to
speak about that on the ML.
You might have to be more specific than
Le ven 12/02/10 14:24, Christensen, Courtney christens...@battelle.org a
écrit:
We use the DumpHTML extension
(http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:DumpHTML) to
make static copies of our wikis. It used to be a maintenance script.
Maybe that would work for you?
The DumpHTML extension is
mwDumper is essential also for anyone wiling to replicate a wiki locally for
any purpose. There are alternatives such as xml2SQL or importDump.php but
mwDumper is the most efficient in terms of correctness and completeness or
speed sometimes.
bilal
==
Verily, with hardship comes ease.
On Fri,
Hi
Almost one month ago I have reported a bug in mwdumper which seems to me to be
critical.
I simply can't user mwdumper with the itwiki XML dumps:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22137
I have extract the problematic part of the XML but until now I do not have had
any remark
emman...@engelhart.org wrote:
mwdumper is an almost mandatory tool to spread our content and for this
reason i wanted to
speak about that on the ML.
You might have to be more specific than that. It doesn't seem like a
mandatory tool to me.
-- Tim Starling
11 matches
Mail list logo
