On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:23 AM, Martijn Hoekstra
wrote:
> In my estimation David is pretty capable of making an informed decision on
> the merits of deploying VE to his wikis.
>
I wouldn't make such assumptions without context. Deploying beta software
in a security sensitive environment is never
On Dec 6, 2013 3:28 AM, "John" wrote:
>
> Correct, I see how my words can be taken several ways. Right now VE is a
> very unstable, bug filled, obnoxious elephant. Given enough time, testing,
> and maturity it as a lot of promise.
>
> Right now its like trying to use a rocket like
> http://cdn.ins
Correct, I see how my words can be taken several ways. Right now VE is a
very unstable, bug filled, obnoxious elephant. Given enough time, testing,
and maturity it as a lot of promise.
Right now its like trying to use a rocket like
http://cdn.instructables.com/F9Y/2ONP/F4TLKVHS/F9Y2ONPF4TLKVHS.LAR
Bad idea [to package/install],…
Is what I believe beta was saying Tyler.
On Friday, December 6, 2013, Tyler Romeo wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 4:39 PM, John >
> wrote:
>
> > VE is a BAD idea, its full of holes and bugs
>
>
> Those are two separate concepts. Just because something has bugs doe
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 4:39 PM, John wrote:
> VE is a BAD idea, its full of holes and bugs
Those are two separate concepts. Just because something has bugs does not
make the software itself a bad idea.
*-- *
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2016
Major in Computer Science
VE is a BAD idea, its full of holes and bugs
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 4:32 PM, David Gerard wrote:
> On 3 December 2013 21:26, Mark A. Hershberger wrote:
>
> > We've put together RC3 for 1.22.0. Please test the tarball and report
> > any bugs you find on Bugzilla: http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/
On 3 December 2013 21:26, Mark A. Hershberger wrote:
> We've put together RC3 for 1.22.0. Please test the tarball and report
> any bugs you find on Bugzilla: http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/
Here's a question: is there a set-out list of steps to enable Visual
Editor in this? Or is VE not quite re
