Until today, an advanced query in our Bugzilla's installation defaulted
to returning bugs marked “WONTFIX” and “LATER”.
Rob and I agreed that we didn't think this wasn't the behavior most
people want so I changed it to remove those resolutions from the
defaults.
Another change I made was to
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Mark A. Hershberger
mhershber...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Until today, an advanced query in our Bugzilla's installation defaulted
to returning bugs marked “WONTFIX” and “LATER”.
We changed this awhile back because we wanted to encourage
people to search for dupes.
On 13.04.2011, 22:01 Mark wrote:
Another change I made was to adjust the default priority to “Low” from
“Normal” so that most bugs don't end up in the priority level that I
want to use for “This should be fixed by next release”. Perhaps many
new bugs should be a priority, but I'd like there
Max Semenik wrote:
On 13.04.2011, 22:01 Mark wrote:
Another change I made was to adjust the default priority to “Low”
from
“Normal” so that most bugs don't end up in the priority level that I
want to use for “This should be fixed by next release”. Perhaps many
new bugs should be a
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Krinkle krinklem...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree. Defaulting new bugs to a low priority doesn't seem very
friendly
to new users. They don't know (and shouldn't have to know) what the
bugmeister's organization is.
Then make a triage priority and default them all
Max Semenik maxsem.w...@gmail.com writes:
This may piss people off (what? my bug is not in their plans?!).
How is that different from how we've been pissing people off with ~2500
bugs against MediaWiki that were opened more than six months ago and
have sat, ignored, without resolution.
I think
- Original Message -
From: OQ overlo...@gmail.com
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Krinkle krinklem...@gmail.com
wrote:
I agree. Defaulting new bugs to a low priority doesn't seem very
friendly
to new users. They don't know (and shouldn't have to know) what the
bugmeister's
