On 22.08.2012 19:32, Chris Steipp wrote:
> I think you were referring to this bug:
> https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38622
Oops. Yea, right, thanks.
-- daniel
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wiki
1300 lines. D: Somebody should really split that. Maybe put the interface
into one file, the abstract class into another, etc.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@gmail.com
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:32 PM,
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Daniel Kinzler wrote:
> On 22.08.2012 15:56, Daniel Friesen wrote:
>> Where is the discussion and review of ContentHandler?
>
> There is not much discussion going on. There's a slowish conversation I'm
> having
> with Tim on Bugzilla:
>
> https://gerrit.wikimedia
On 22.08.2012 15:56, Daniel Friesen wrote:
> Where is the discussion and review of ContentHandler?
There is not much discussion going on. There's a slowish conversation I'm having
with Tim on Bugzilla:
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/gitweb?p=mediawiki%2Fcore.git;a=shortlog;h=refs%2Fheads%2FWikida
AFAIK the Wikidata branch just contains content handler stuff. Daniel K
knows better what's on there though.
Sent from my Android phone.
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Where is the discussion and review of ContentHandler?
ContentHandler is something I'd really like to see make it into core. It's
useful for far more than just Wikidata.
I'd like to comment and review some part of the code. Like method naming
patterns that don't match the patterns we use elsew
