On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 3:15 AM, Alex Brollo wrote:
> I saved the HTML source of a typical Page: page from it.source, the
> resulting txt file having ~ 28 kBy; then I saved the "core html" only, t.i.
> the content of , and this file have 2.1 kBy; so
> there's a more than tenfold ratio between "cont
2011/4/6 Daniel Kinzler
> > I
> > know that some thousands of calls are nothing for wiki servers, but... I
> > always try to get a good performance, even from the most banal template.
>
>
> That'S always a good idea :)
>
> -- daniel
>
Thanks Daniel. So, my edits will drop again. I'll put myself
Hi Alex
> Thanks Daniel, API stuff is a little hard for me: the more I study, the
> less I edit. :-)
>
> Just to have a try, I called the same page, "render" action gives a file of
> ~ 3.4 kBy, "api" action a file of ~ 5.6 kBy.
That's because the render call returns just the HTML, while the API
2011/4/6 Daniel Kinzler
> On 06.04.2011 09:15, Alex Brollo wrote:
> > I saved the HTML source of a typical Page: page from it.source, the
> > resulting txt file having ~ 28 kBy; then I saved the "core html" only,
> t.i.
> > the content of , and this file have 2.1 kBy; so
> > there's a more than t
On 06.04.2011 09:15, Alex Brollo wrote:
> I saved the HTML source of a typical Page: page from it.source, the
> resulting txt file having ~ 28 kBy; then I saved the "core html" only, t.i.
> the content of , and this file have 2.1 kBy; so
> there's a more than tenfold ratio between "container" and "
I saved the HTML source of a typical Page: page from it.source, the
resulting txt file having ~ 28 kBy; then I saved the "core html" only, t.i.
the content of , and this file have 2.1 kBy; so
there's a more than tenfold ratio between "container" and "real content".
I there a trick to download the
