On 14-04-11 10:02 Daniel Kinzler dan...@brightbyte.de wrote:
Wow, seriously? IE6 should be taken out the back and shot...
You're in luck. These days, even Microsoft agrees with you:
http://www.ie6countdown.com/
So when will we be able to drop IE6 support in MediaWiki completely? What
2011/4/14 Siebrand Mazeland s.mazel...@xs4all.nl:
So when will we be able to drop IE6 support in MediaWiki completely? What
metrics/thresholds can we use?
IMO there's a difference between no longer supporting IE6 and no
longer protecting IE6 users from XSS attacks.
I would suggest to set a
On 14.04.2011 11:10, Siebrand Mazeland wrote:
On 14-04-11 10:02 Daniel Kinzler dan...@brightbyte.de wrote:
Wow, seriously? IE6 should be taken out the back and shot...
You're in luck. These days, even Microsoft agrees with you:
http://www.ie6countdown.com/
Aw man, someone please spoof
Hi,
Le jeudi 14 avril 2011 11:21:57, Daniel Kinzler a écrit :
On 14.04.2011 11:10, Siebrand Mazeland wrote:
On 14-04-11 10:02 Daniel Kinzler dan...@brightbyte.de wrote:
Wow, seriously? IE6 should be taken out the back and shot...
You're in luck. These days, even Microsoft agrees with
Hoi,
The people with IE6 have disproportionally problems with reading Wikipedia
in their mother tongue and IE6 can be found particularly in the global
south. Also CommScore numbers are unlikely to see this potential.
The question is not should we support IE6, it is just that I wonder about
what
2011/4/14 Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com:
Hoi,
The people with IE6 have disproportionally problems with reading Wikipedia
in their mother tongue and IE6 can be found particularly in the global
south. Also CommScore numbers are unlikely to see this potential.
The question is not
*For reading*, we aim to support any browser with 0.1%[1] use or more.
This has both culled things out, like IE 5.5, and surfaced things like NetFront
(Sony Playstation Browser).
*For security*, if it's possible to protect the site or our users, and we have
money in the bank, we should be
