Thank you for the explanations.
On 11/07/2012 11:47 AM, Terry Chay wrote:
It turns out we use a lot of industry
terminology, without realizing that we are poorly communicating what
that means to most people.
Actually I'm familiar with industry terminology, and also with the wrong
assumptions
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Quim Gil wrote:
> Whatever the result, I hope we end up with teams where software developers,
> sysadmins, product managers, designers etc are well mixed in focused teams
> going after clear common goals.
Absolutely. Teams are assembled cross-functionally to ensu
On 7 November 2012 11:47, Terry Chay wrote:
> Take care,
>
> terry
Terry this is great, thank you for writing it. I was on a two-hour
call glancing at this thread, knowing Erik's travelling, and wondering
if I should reply in his stead. Glad you did it :-)
Thanks,
Sue
__
Quim,
On Nov 7, 2012, at 10:00 AM, Quim Gil wrote:
> Hi, am I the only one having difficulties understanding the proposal and what
> it implies?
You aren't the only one. It turns out we use a lot of industry
terminology, without realizing that we are poorly communicating what that mea
+1. I love the fact that these sorts of things are being discussed
publicly, but I have no idea what the difference between "product" and
"engineering" is. I have a vague idea, like that ops probably falls
under engineering, and AFT like things probably fall under product.
However I wouldn't know w
Hi, am I the only one having difficulties understanding the proposal and
what it implies?
On 11/05/2012 07:03 PM, Erik Moeller wrote:
we need to split the current department into an engineering dept
and a product dept in about 6-8 months.
It is strange to see "engineering" and "product" side
On 6 November 2012 11:23, K. Peachey wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Erik Moeller wrote:
>> The way we’d get there:
>>
>> I’m prepared to resign from my engineering management responsibilities
>> and to focus solely on my remaining role as VP of Product, as soon as
>> a successor for VP
(Double Post, Since this was crossposted in the first place, and to
make sure I hit both lists, Sorry Wikitech)
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Erik Moeller wrote:
> The way we’d get there:
>
> I’m prepared to resign from my engineering management responsibilities
> and to focus solely on my rema
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Erik Moeller wrote:
> The way we’d get there:
>
> I’m prepared to resign from my engineering management responsibilities
> and to focus solely on my remaining role as VP of Product, as soon as
> a successor for VP of Engineering has been identified. We would start
>
FYI
-- Forwarded message --
From: Erik Moeller
Date: Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 5:38 PM
Subject: [Tech/Product] Engineering/Product org structure
To: Staff All
Hi folks,
consistent with Sue's narrowing focus mandate, I’ve been thinking &
talking the last few weeks a fair bit with a
10 matches
Mail list logo
