Hi, please check this draft plan for the next steps in the Phabricator RfC
at
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Phabricator/Plan
This aims to be a starting point for the next round of discussion to be
held online and at the Wikimedia hackathon in Zürich this weekend. Edits,
OK, so I'm sorry if this information is duplicated anywhere, but between
the Project Management Tools review page, the Phabricator RFC, the various
sub-pages of the RFC, and the content on the Phabricator instance itself,
it would take me at least a couple of hours to organize my thoughts. So
I'll
On Mon, 2014-05-05 at 12:18 -0400, Tyler Romeo wrote:
Phabricator still does not work directly with Git, right?
This topic is covered in http://fab.wmflabs.org/T207
andre
--
Andre Klapper | Wikimedia Bugwrangler
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/
___
On Monday, May 5, 2014, Tyler Romeo tylerro...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, so I'm sorry if this information is duplicated anywhere, but between
the Project Management Tools review page, the Phabricator RFC, the various
sub-pages of the RFC, and the content on the Phabricator instance itself,
it
On 05/05/2014 01:21 PM, Quim Gil wrote:
I created
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Phabricator/versus_Bugzillato
consolidate the relevant information for bug reporters.
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Phabricator/versus_Bugzilla
Phabricator still does
