On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Pine W wrote:
> Thanks. Perhaps some work on CAPTCHA could happen via a Project grant once
> there is a concrete proposal that's agreeable to the participants and WMF?
> Pinging Marti to ask about the possibility.
>
Bccing Marti because a
Hey Pine,
Responses in-line.
On 9 December 2015 at 22:14, Pine W wrote:
> Hi, just checking to see if CAPTCHA improvements are likely anytime in the
> near future. I notice that
> https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/project/board/225/ shows nothing under
> "Awaiting code
Thanks. Perhaps some work on CAPTCHA could happen via a Project grant once
there is a concrete proposal that's agreeable to the participants and WMF?
Pinging Marti to ask about the possibility.
Pine
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Dan Garry wrote:
> Hey Pine,
>
>
Hi, just checking to see if CAPTCHA improvements are likely anytime in the
near future. I notice that
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/project/board/225/ shows nothing under
"Awaiting code review". Is anyone working on this? If not, what kind of
nudge would be necessary to get some resources
Jamison Lofthouse wrote:
The subject sounds exactly like the reCAPTCHA
https://www.google.com/recaptcha/intro/index.html tagline. Not sure how
beneficial the project would be but I have seen it used. Maybe worth
looking into.
Thanks,
Negative24
I should note that the latest reCAPTCHA¹ is
On 19 August 2015 at 23:06, Matthew Flaschen mflasc...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
I agree this is an important issue. It just isn't resourced right now by
the WMF, as far as I know.
Indeed. There have been numerous discussions about the captcha on this
mailing list over the past few years, but no
On 8/25/15, Dan Garry dga...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On 19 August 2015 at 23:06, Matthew Flaschen mflasc...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
I agree this is an important issue. It just isn't resourced right now by
the WMF, as far as I know.
Indeed. There have been numerous discussions about the captcha
On 08/19/2015 10:17 PM, Jamison Lofthouse wrote:
The subject sounds exactly like the reCAPTCHA
https://www.google.com/recaptcha/intro/index.html tagline. Not sure how
beneficial the project would be but I have seen it used. Maybe worth
looking into.
Unfortunately, we can not use reCAPTCHA
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 8:06 AM, Matthew Flaschen mflasc...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
On 08/19/2015 10:17 PM, Jamison Lofthouse wrote:
The subject sounds exactly like the reCAPTCHA
https://www.google.com/recaptcha/intro/index.html tagline. Not sure how
beneficial the project would be but I
The subject sounds exactly like the reCAPTCHA
https://www.google.com/recaptcha/intro/index.html tagline. Not sure how
beneficial the project would be but I have seen it used. Maybe worth
looking into.
Thanks,
Negative24
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:04 AM Luis Villa lvi...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Tuesday, August 18, 2015, Pine W wiki.p...@gmail.com wrote:
what's happening with regard to improving usability for humans and
increasing the difficulty for bots?
Generally speaking, isnt that an open problem in computer science?
--
Bawolff
___
Just for the record, this is not a matter for my talk page. I don't
encourage using my talk page either to circumvent existing prioritization
processes, or to try to resolve deeply complex CS questions. ;) Wikitech
(or perhaps Phabricator, depending on the team) is a much more appropriate
place
Brian,
Quite likely. (: But the Wikimedia CAPTCHA workboard suggests a lack of
emphasis on improving the general CAPTCHA situation for Wikimedia. The two
high priority tasks on that Phabricator workboard last received comments in
May and June. Those dates, plus the relative quiet on this mailing
I see that there's an active workboard in Phabricator at
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/project/board/225/ for CAPTCHA issues.
Returning to a subject that has been discussed several times before: the
last I heard is that our current CAPTCHAs do block some spambots, but they
also present
14 matches
Mail list logo