I was working with Victor a bit to see how close to JS we could get
WikiScripts syntax to be, and it seemed like it was possible but some
things (like objects) would either be a hack to fake in some ways or a
larger job to get working. Not sure if he's got more progress in that way
to show, but
On 23.12.2011 18:21, Dmitriy Sintsov wrote:
I remember that PHP had some outdated and unmaintained sandboxing PECL
module, however it's unmaintained for a long time.
http://php.net/manual/en/runkit.sandbox.php
Dmitriy
Dmitry Zenovich applied for maintaining it last year, although little
* Keisial keis...@gmail.com [Sun, 25 Dec 2011 23:16:46 +0100]:
On 23.12.2011 18:21, Dmitriy Sintsov wrote:
I remember that PHP had some outdated and unmaintained sandboxing
PECL
module, however it's unmaintained for a long time.
http://php.net/manual/en/runkit.sandbox.php
Dmitriy
- Original Message -
From: Victor Vasiliev vasi...@gmail.com
Lua is great, however, it's a bit strange to use two interpreters
(PHP+Lua) together. That limits hosting possibilities and it's
something
like using two similar screwdrivers for the same screw.
Not really. Lua was
I do have some spare time over the holiday and I can take a shot at
hacking together a node.js equivalent of the Lua extension. Is that
really the highest priority though? I'm willing to do it, but it seems
like there are also a lot of other questions to be answered besides
just the
On 23.12.2011 18:30, Jay Ashworth wrote:
This is a really critical point: if you're going to provide an
interpreted language to end-users from within a program that is,
itself, written in an interpreted language, *you cannot use the
underlying interpreter* to run the end-users' programs,
- Original Message -
From: Peter Kaminski kamin...@istori.com
I don't have anything particular against Lua and no particular love for
JavaScript, but JS seems more web-native; plus code and skills developed
can accrue to both client- and server-side of the web.
Just so I'm clear:
Yep, this is for server side code, giving users a better template programming
language.
On Dec 22, 2011, at 7:17 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Peter Kaminski kamin...@istori.com
I don't have anything particular against Lua and no particular love for
I think that would be a nice feature to have. Amazingly enough, WikiScripts is
not of the extensions that we have in our codebase at wikia (I think we're over
800+), but I will take a look at the implementation. The lua parser hook
allows for parameters, but that's not the same. Having
* Owen Davis o...@wikia-inc.com [Thu, 22 Dec 2011 11:50:48 -0800]:
I think that would be a nice feature to have. Amazingly enough,
WikiScripts is not of the extensions that we have in our codebase at
wikia (I think we're over 800+), but I will take a look at the
implementation. The lua
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Dmitriy Sintsov ques...@rambler.ru wrote:
Also it would be great if WikiScripts or Lua extension allowed to easily
bind functions / class wrappers for another MediaWiki extensions. The
extension I develop uses PHP eval for interpretation of the scripts, I
am
* Victor Vasiliev vasi...@gmail.com [Fri, 23 Dec 2011 09:46:46 +0400]:
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Dmitriy Sintsov ques...@rambler.ru
wrote:
Also it would be great if WikiScripts or Lua extension allowed to
easily
bind functions / class wrappers for another MediaWiki extensions.
The
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Dmitriy Sintsov ques...@rambler.ru wrote:
Victor, what do you think about making WikiScripts syntax more similar
to the subset of Lua or JavaScript syntax? That probably should not be
too hard?
It is already almost a JavaScript subset
What's about
Rob Lanphier robla at wikimedia.org writes:
Tim Starling tstarling at wikimedia.org wrote:
We still want to do something about parser performance in the first
half of 2012, so we're going to bring forward our other performance
project, i.e. server-side scripting embedded in wikitext.
On 12/21/11 11:18 AM, Owen Davis wrote:
I'm going to look at something simple like Moustache (which has both
JS and Lua implementations already) as a proof of concept.
I really like the idea of using JavaScript+Mustache+Node.js. Plus
there's a Mustache compiler for Node:
* Owen Davis o...@wikia-inc.com [Wed, 21 Dec 2011 19:18:46 +
(UTC)]:
It is littered with embedded HTML and string.format statements. Ugh.
I'm going to look at something simple like Moustache (which has both
JS and Lua implementations already) as a proof of concept. Does
anybody have a
* Owen Davis o...@wikia-inc.com [Wed, 21 Dec 2011 19:18:46 +
(UTC)]:
It is littered with embedded HTML and string.format statements. Ugh.
I'm going to look at something simple like Moustache (which has both
JS and Lua implementations already) as a proof of concept. Does
anybody have a
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 9:00 PM, Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.org wrote:
We still want to do something about parser performance in the first
half of 2012, so we're going to bring forward our other performance
project, i.e. server-side scripting embedded in wikitext. That's a
project which
18 matches
Mail list logo
