Re: [Wikitech-l] Marking /trunk/extensions as read-only

2012-11-01 Thread Quim Gil
For what is worth, thanks to Federico we have now nice stats showing the activity in the SVN repository: https://www.ohloh.net/p/mediawiki-extensions-wmf-hosted-svn https://www.ohloh.net/p/mediawiki-extensions-wmf-hosted-svn/contributors?sort=latest_commit The contribution trend is clearly

Re: [Wikitech-l] Marking /trunk/extensions as read-only

2012-10-25 Thread Chad
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 6:52 PM, Platonides platoni...@gmail.com wrote: On 24/10/12 21:21, Chad wrote: Hi everyone, I was wondering what people thought of marking /trunk/extensions in SVN as read only. Pretty much every active extension (as far as I can tell) has been moved out already. It

Re: [Wikitech-l] Marking /trunk/extensions as read-only

2012-10-25 Thread Siebrand Mazeland (WMF)
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 6:52 PM, Platonides platoni...@gmail.com wrote: On 24/10/12 21:21, Chad wrote: I was wondering what people thought of marking /trunk/extensions in SVN as read only. Thoughts? I don't see the need

Re: [Wikitech-l] Marking /trunk/extensions as read-only

2012-10-25 Thread Platonides
On 25/10/12 14:28, Chad wrote: Keeps new extensions from being committed to SVN. If something is still being maintained, it should be moved to Git. -Chad Where new extensions committed in svn since git migration? People with a svn account should know git is prefered now, and new people isn't

Re: [Wikitech-l] Marking /trunk/extensions as read-only

2012-10-25 Thread Quim Gil
On 10/25/2012 09:56 AM, Platonides wrote: People with a svn account should know git is prefered now Finding out the old SVN repo is now read-only is a good way for that target group to learn about the now official gerrit.mediwiki.org , isn't it. We have enough confusion for contributors

Re: [Wikitech-l] Marking /trunk/extensions as read-only

2012-10-25 Thread Platonides
On 25/10/12 19:20, Quim Gil wrote: On 10/25/2012 09:56 AM, Platonides wrote: People with a svn account should know git is prefered now Finding out the old SVN repo is now read-only is a good way for that target group to learn about the now official gerrit.mediwiki.org , isn't it. My point

[Wikitech-l] Marking /trunk/extensions as read-only

2012-10-24 Thread Chad
Hi everyone, I was wondering what people thought of marking /trunk/extensions in SVN as read only. Pretty much every active extension (as far as I can tell) has been moved out already. It doesn't preclude us from migrating any of these extensions to Git at a later date, and nothing is being

Re: [Wikitech-l] Marking /trunk/extensions as read-only

2012-10-24 Thread Jeroen De Dauw
+1. Go for (g)it! Sent from my HTC one X. ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] Marking /trunk/extensions as read-only

2012-10-24 Thread Platonides
On 24/10/12 21:21, Chad wrote: Hi everyone, I was wondering what people thought of marking /trunk/extensions in SVN as read only. Pretty much every active extension (as far as I can tell) has been moved out already. It doesn't preclude us from migrating any of these extensions to Git at a