* Aryeh Gregor simetrical+wikil...@gmail.com [Sun, 25 Apr 2010
20:46:14 -0400]:
In XML, named entity references like nbsp; and bull; (with the
special exceptions of lt; gt; amp; quot; apos;) can be treated as
well-formedness errors across the board by conformant XML processors.
(Yes, this
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 4:02 AM, Dmitriy Sintsov ques...@rambler.ru wrote:
Wouldn't it be enough just to define an entity?
http://www.criticism.com/dita/dtd2.html#section-ENTITIES
I used such definition for nbsp once in XSL sheet. Don't know how well
it works alone in XML.
I guess that would
Aryeh Gregor wrote:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 4:02 AM, Dmitriy Sintsov ques...@rambler.ru wrote:
Wouldn't it be enough just to define an entity?
http://www.criticism.com/dita/dtd2.html#section-ENTITIES
I used such definition for nbsp once in XSL sheet. Don't know how well
it works alone in XML.
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Platonides platoni...@gmail.com wrote:
I suppose that you could link to a local copy of the DTD, that would
keep happy but would probably break more parsing, since html doctypes
are more or less magic words for many programs dealing with it
(beginning with
