Re: [Wikitech-l] Phabricator was down for a short time today (April 4th)

2016-04-15 Thread Mukunda Modell
Indeed, Jaime, I think that will be possible very soon. The upstream task I linked to previously (https://secure.phabricator.com/T10751) is about two things: 1. properly handling clustered databases, especially dealing with read-only slaves 2. Implementing replicated git hosting, where

Re: [Wikitech-l] Phabricator was down for a short time today (April 4th)

2016-04-14 Thread Jaime Crespo
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 10:26 PM, Mukunda Modell wrote: > Phabricator is gaining improved high-availability support thanks to recent > work upstream, so it might be possible to have dual-master phabricator > nodes in the near future. See

Re: [Wikitech-l] Phabricator was down for a short time today (April 4th)

2016-04-14 Thread Mukunda Modell
I would like to see Phabricator move to a virtual owed cluster, or even a bare metal cluster. However, I would not include Phabricator in a list of "not-so-resource-consuming services." Phabricator definitely uses significant amount of resources. It's running on a 12 core server with 64gb ram and

Re: [Wikitech-l] Phabricator was down for a short time today (April 4th)

2016-04-04 Thread Ricordisamoa
Cool down, Phab. Cool down. We need you. Il 04/04/2016 19:57, Greg Grossmeier ha scritto: Apologies for not sending out this announcement before hand. Short summary: The machine that Phabricator is hosted on rebooted itself last night due to high temperatures. It ended up just shutting itself

Re: [Wikitech-l] Phabricator was down for a short time today (April 4th)

2016-04-04 Thread Alex Monk
Yeah... It also still mentions mchenry. I marked it as outdated. On 4 April 2016 at 19:24, Vituzzu wrote: > Uhm, tech still lists OTRS on iodine, which seems to be decommissioned. I > had a look at >

Re: [Wikitech-l] Phabricator was down for a short time today (April 4th)

2016-04-04 Thread Vituzzu
Uhm, tech still lists OTRS on iodine, which seems to be decommissioned. I had a look at http://ganglia.wikimedia.org/latest/?r=year===cpu_report=Miscellaneous+eqiad=iridium.eqiad.wmnet=m==false=2=medium_group=NOGROUPS and...well fairly busy but still "packable", though I'll let more

Re: [Wikitech-l] Phabricator was down for a short time today (April 4th)

2016-04-04 Thread Alex Monk
Actually I believe OTRS was moved into the ganeti VM cluster a couple of months ago. I'm not sure whether Phabricator is considered a not-so-resource-consuming service... On 4 April 2016 at 19:01, Vituzzu wrote: > Why not a small virtualised cluster for these

Re: [Wikitech-l] Phabricator was down for a short time today (April 4th)

2016-04-04 Thread Vituzzu
Why not a small virtualised cluster for these not-so-resource-consuming services like OTRS, phab, etc? /me runs away before writing the world-which-shouldn't be written Vito Il 04/04/2016 19:57, Greg Grossmeier ha scritto: Apologies for not sending out this announcement before hand. Short

[Wikitech-l] Phabricator was down for a short time today (April 4th)

2016-04-04 Thread Greg Grossmeier
Apologies for not sending out this announcement before hand. Short summary: The machine that Phabricator is hosted on rebooted itself last night due to high temperatures. It ended up just shutting itself down. Today we needed our DataCenter Technician to reapply the thermal paste in an attempt