On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Tim Landscheidt
t...@tim-landscheidt.de wrote:
[...]
Not to quote from another video about GitHub (where issues
have only title and comment), let's not forget Git: No bug-
tracker at all :-).
Tim
According the http://git-scm.com/community page:
Bug reports
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 22:23 +, Tim Landscheidt wrote:
If at the moment the priority field neither necessarily
triggers action nor reflects the actual state of affairs,
why even bother and not just delete/hide it from view? This
would free more time to fix bugs.
I don't see how dropping
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 22:23 +, Tim Landscheidt wrote:
If at the moment the priority field neither necessarily
triggers action nor reflects the actual state of affairs,
why even bother and not just delete/hide it
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Right now I'd like to introduce a clear way to mark issues that should
be handled immediately.
This.
Also
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 9:56 AM, bawolff bawolff...@gmail.com wrote:
An alternative way of looking at
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 12:56 PM, bawolff bawolff...@gmail.com wrote:
What I would really like to see is banning users from touching the
priority field. The field is made rather useless by bug reporters who
feel their pet issue is the most important thing to ever happen - and
suddenly there's
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 17:39 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
I propose adding a *new* priority called Immediate which should only
be used to mark really urgent stuff to fix. This priority would be added
above the existing Highest priority.
1) Look at the current distribution of priorities at
On 27 November 2012 17:09, Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org wrote:
2) Look at our priority definitions in
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Bugzilla/Fields#Priority
a) normal means Should be fixed by the next release.[1]
This is extremely unrealistic with above usage of Normal.
You may be
Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org wrote:
[...]
So in a mysterious future not that far away, I'd like to merge Normal
and Low, or Low and Lowest priorities.
Combined with a new Immediate priority as proposed above (quoting
myself), we would keep the same number of priorities, but we'd
