On 12/28/2012 11:30 AM, Tim Landscheidt wrote:
Quim Gil wrote:
[...]
This doesn't happen in groups defined by geography who do
not have any other responsibility, but I certainly share
Sébastien's concern about groups targetting other fields.
Still concerned?
Yes :-). In my experience,
Quim Gil wrote:
> [...]
>> This doesn't happen in groups defined by geography who do
>> not have any other responsibility, but I certainly share
>> Sébastien's concern about groups targetting other fields.
> Still concerned?
Yes :-). In my experience, creating groups will keep some
from lendi
On 12/27/2012 02:31 PM, Matthew Flaschen wrote:
On 12/27/2012 05:04 PM, Sébastien Santoro wrote:
So we're speaking about potential need to incorporation and potential
trademark agreements.
But this isn't a bureaucratic road. Okay...
It specifically says "may be incorporated" not "must be inc
On 12/27/2012 05:04 PM, Sébastien Santoro wrote:
> So we're speaking about potential need to incorporation and potential
> trademark agreements.
>
> But this isn't a bureaucratic road. Okay...
It specifically says "may be incorporated" not "must be incorporated".
MediaWiki groups may allow that
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Sébastien Santoro
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Quim Gil wrote:
>> On 12/27/2012 07:38 AM, Sébastien Santoro wrote:
>> I don't see the bureaucratic burden you mention. The tough part of creating
>> a Bug Squad team is to recruit the people and keep th
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Quim Gil wrote:
> On 12/27/2012 07:38 AM, Sébastien Santoro wrote:
> I don't see the bureaucratic burden you mention. The tough part of creating
> a Bug Squad team is to recruit the people and keep them active as a team.
> Formalize that as a MediaWiki Group is jus
On 12/27/2012 10:34 AM, Tim Landscheidt wrote:
I think the problem with some groups is that if you are not
in the group, you're not in the group. Do you need to join
the Bug Squad to squash bugs?
Of course not. You don't need to join the Browser Testing team to define
test cases, the Promot
Quim Gil wrote:
> [...]
>> This is a dangerous precedents to a bureaucratization of our
>> fundamental processes. A group should be about a vision. My vision of
>> this proposal is I clearly see this proposal as the first step in a
>> path who will lead to a road, where we will ask new contribut
On 12/27/2012 07:38 AM, Sébastien Santoro wrote:
To create a bug squad is a nice idea, and, as a volunteer active on
Bugzilla, of course, I'm interested.
To create a MediaWiki Group Bug Squad is something else.
I fail to see why, and I really appreciate the fact that you are going
to the deta
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 7:02 AM, Tyler Romeo wrote:
> You can count me in as interested. I can't add my name on my own, though,
> since I'm IP blocked from editing on WMF wikis.
Please request an IP exemption.
>> Hi, following the process for requesting the creation of a MediaWiki group,
>> here
You can count me in as interested. I can't add my name on my own, though,
since I'm IP blocked from editing on WMF wikis.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com
| tylerro...@gmail.com
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 12:49 AM, Va
Hi, following the process for requesting the creation of a MediaWiki group,
here is a proposal for
MediaWiki Group Bug Squad
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Groups/Proposals/Bug_Squad
Your endorsements, improvements and feedback are welcome at the wiki page.
Thank you!
PS: see also http://www.med
12 matches
Mail list logo
