În mar., 11 ian. 2022 la 08:01, Kunal Mehta a scris:
>
> So I think the status quo can be changed by just about anyone who is
> motivated to do so, not by trying to convince the WMF to change its
> prioritization, but just by doing the work. We should be empowering
> those people rather than
(Speaking in my volunteer capacity)
I doubt there is any malicious intent by WMF. I personally think the
underlying problem is time. Let me explain.
Fixing a big issue in software takes time (I wrote a long essay about it in
this thread) so it makes sense WMF annual planning to focus on issues
Honestly, I find the "not in the annual plan" thing more damning than the
actual issue at hand.
The core competency of WMF is supposed to be keeping the site running. WMF
does a lot of things, some of them very useful, others less so, but at its
core its mission is to keep the site going.
Hi,
On 1/1/22 12:10, Asaf Bartov wrote:
It seems to me there are *very few* people who could change status quo,
not much more than a handful: the Foundation's executive leadership (in
its annual planning work, coming up this first quarter of 2022), and the
Board of Trustees.
If the goal is
Hi Asaf,
That's a good response, but I'm not sure it provides a practical way
forward. How can volunteers bring this issue to the attention of the WMF
leadership to get the allocation of the time of Wikimedia staff who can
take ownership implement changes here?
Presumably emails on these
