27 Октябрь 2012 г. 23:20:39 пользователь Chad (innocentkil...@gmail.com)
написал:
Not to mention varnish/squid.
Varnish author on SPDY:
http://developers.slashdot.org/story/12/07/13/1327235/varnish-author-suggests-spdy-should-be-viewed-as-a-prototype
The author of Varnish, Poul-Henning
Yeah, I have to agree on this one. I was never a particular fan of SPDY.
Yes, HTTP needs a reworking, but only the concepts behind SPDY are good,
not its actual implementation. I'd sooner implement some sort of WebSocket
interface for MW, such as having the server push load.php resources over a
On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 23:22:04 -0700, Tyler Romeo tylerro...@gmail.com
wrote:
Yeah, I have to agree on this one. I was never a particular fan of SPDY.
Yes, HTTP needs a reworking, but only the concepts behind SPDY are good,
not its actual implementation. I'd sooner implement some sort of
Of course this is pretty much impossible with PHP. Of course this is
pretty much impossible with PHP.
No it's not. You use PHP's sockets functions, albeit PHP is probably not
the most optimal language for setting up a websocket server.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class
On Oct 28, 2012 1:54 AM, Ryan Lane rlan...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, nginx didn't support this until fairly recently. We plan on
testing this fairly soon. I upgraded one of the ssl boxes yesterday
and re-pooled it. Once I'm confident it's not causing any issues I'll
upgrade the rest and then we
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 09:52:34PM +0300, Strainu wrote:
Are there any plans for an SPDY [1] test on the Wikimedia servers?
I'm currently doing some speed tests on a robot and I found out (not
quite to my surprise) that it's much quicker to get whole pages
(hundreds at a time) than to ask
Hi,
Are there any plans for an SPDY [1] test on the Wikimedia servers?
I'm currently doing some speed tests on a robot and I found out (not
quite to my surprise) that it's much quicker to get whole pages
(hundreds at a time) than to ask the API for each page's last edit
time. I would love to see
Since Apache tends to be the main web server people use, in order to make
MediaWiki use SPDY, we'd have to work with mod_spdy. Does anybody know how
stable this is?
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com |
Not to mention varnish/squid.
-Chad
On Oct 27, 2012 2:59 PM, Tyler Romeo tylerro...@gmail.com wrote:
Since Apache tends to be the main web server people use, in order to make
MediaWiki use SPDY, we'd have to work with mod_spdy. Does anybody know how
stable this is?
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
We don't even do HTTP/1.1 yet - lack of Transfer-Encoding: Chunked has
bit me badly before.
--
Yuvi Panda T
http://yuvi.in/blog
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Are there any plans for an SPDY [1] test on the Wikimedia servers?
I have plans on testing it in production when nginx supports it stably.
- Ryan
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Yuvi Panda yuvipa...@gmail.com wrote:
We don't even do HTTP/1.1 yet - lack of Transfer-Encoding: Chunked has
bit me badly before.
Well, nginx didn't support this until fairly recently. We plan on
testing this fairly soon. I upgraded one of the ssl boxes
12 matches
Mail list logo