+1 for something like this. Its not a huge problem not to do semver but
it'd be simpler to explain if we did.
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Legoktm legoktm.wikipe...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 01/15/2015 08:26 PM, Chad wrote:
I've been saying for over a year now we should just drop the 1. from
On 01/15/2015 08:26 PM, Chad wrote:
I've been saying for over a year now we should just drop the 1. from
the 1.x.y release versions. So the next release would be 25.0, 26.0,
etc etc.
+1, let's do this. It would allow us to follow semver and still retain
our current version number history
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Legoktm legoktm.wikipe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/15/2015 08:26 PM, Chad wrote:
I've been saying for over a year now we should just drop the 1. from
the 1.x.y release versions. So the next release would be 25.0, 26.0,
etc etc.
-1 from me, for what little that's
On 01/25/2015 06:04 PM, Zack Weinberg wrote:
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Legoktm legoktm.wikipe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/15/2015 08:26 PM, Chad wrote:
I've been saying for over a year now we should just drop the 1. from
the 1.x.y release versions. So the next release would be 25.0, 26.0,
On 2015-01-25 6:04 PM, Zack Weinberg wrote:
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Legoktm legoktm.wikipe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/15/2015 08:26 PM, Chad wrote:
I've been saying for over a year now we should just drop the 1. from
the 1.x.y release versions. So the next release would be 25.0, 26.0,
