Risker wrote:
On 23 July 2013 15:32, Robert Rohde raro...@gmail.com wrote:
* Corrupted page content that appears to be caused by the unfamiliar
UI (e.g. nowiki[[Foo]]/nowiki)
Why do you think those nowiki tags were added by the editors?
I assume that since it's VE's job to be wysiwyg, and to
Whoops, didn't realize this thread had been forked off while I was out
to lunch, and so I responded to the other thread. Sorry about that :(
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Steve Summit s...@eskimo.com wrote:
This is a likely enough mistake, and the number of times you
really want explicit
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 6:11 AM, Steve Summit s...@eskimo.com wrote:
VE will (correctly, from its point of view) translate that to
nowiki[[pagename]]/nowiki in the page source.
This is a likely enough mistake, and the number of times you
really want explicit double square brackets is small
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:14 PM, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote:
There is an enhancement for that.
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51897
IMO the current behaviour isnt correct. There are so few instances
that nowiki is desirable, that the current VE should refuse to
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Roan Kattouw roan.katt...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
We disagree on that one then. VisualEditor is meant to hide wikitext
entirely. The primary focus is on people that don't know wikitext. I
agree that we should keep nowiki-fication to a minimum and get rid of
the
