Re: [Wikitech-l] productivity of mediawiki developers

2017-05-29 Thread Andre Klapper
On Sat, 2016-04-02 at 21:10 +0200, Florian Schmidt wrote: > I'm pretty sure http://korma.wmflabs.org/browser/scm.html and other > pages of korma will give you some information. For the records, in the meantime korma.wmflabs.org got replaced by https://wikimedia.biterg.io/ . Documentation is

Re: [Wikitech-l] productivity of mediawiki developers

2016-04-07 Thread Stas Malyshev
Hi! > I personally reserve -2 for "this is a fundamentally bad idea" or "this > requires > community consensus before being implemented". Anything that is fixable in the > code should get a -1 or 0. > > Btw, I personally prefer to get -1 reviews over 0 reviews, simply because it's > easier to

Re: [Wikitech-l] productivity of mediawiki developers

2016-04-05 Thread Daniel Kinzler
I personally reserve -2 for "this is a fundamentally bad idea" or "this requires community consensus before being implemented". Anything that is fixable in the code should get a -1 or 0. Btw, I personally prefer to get -1 reviews over 0 reviews, simply because it's easier to spot them as "todo"

Re: [Wikitech-l] productivity of mediawiki developers

2016-04-05 Thread Jon Robson
I think a review is valuable no matter what the score... with the possible exception of -2 which I fear is probably a bit too aggressive and unnecessary in our ecosystem for which reason the reading web team agreed to avoid the use of -2 except to stop merges in progress that were not ready. I

Re: [Wikitech-l] productivity of mediawiki developers

2016-04-05 Thread Federico Leva (Nemo)
> I, for example, value better good -1 code reviews Same here. There are statistics for -1 too, two clicks away from the link I provided in the previous message. https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Gerrit/Reports/Code_review_activity Nemo ___ Wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] productivity of mediawiki developers

2016-04-04 Thread Pine W
Niklas puts it well. Analogously, in sports like baseball there are lots of statistics about players, coaches, teams, divisions, and leagues. Awards are given based strictly on quantities, as well as more subjectively on qualities for recognitions such as Rookie of the Year and Most Valuable

Re: [Wikitech-l] productivity of mediawiki developers

2016-04-04 Thread Joaquin Oltra Hernandez
I agree we should give recognition and encouragement to devs, but I think there are other ways to do it we could think about besides sheer number of commits, +2s or lines modified. I personally think that rewarding high numbers encourages quantity over quality (only big numbers are recognized)

Re: [Wikitech-l] productivity of mediawiki developers

2016-04-04 Thread Niklas Laxström
2016-04-04 17:02 GMT+03:00 Quim Gil : > The first question to answer is what information are you looking for when > you want to measure developers' "productivity". What would be the > motivation of that estimation? What is the motivation behind this thread? One reason comes to

Re: [Wikitech-l] productivity of mediawiki developers

2016-04-04 Thread Quim Gil
On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Pine W wrote: > Yeah. It would be interesting to have multiple measures of "productivity" > for technical contributors, including code review. > > Quim: is this something that's within Technical Collaboration's scope? If > not, perhaps it's

Re: [Wikitech-l] productivity of mediawiki developers

2016-04-04 Thread Joaquin Oltra Hernandez
Lines added: Last 365 days: 20,176,017 Lines removed: Last 365 days: 14,378,469 Is this ^ right? Those are really big numbers! On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 10:39 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote: > For statistics, see https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Development_statistics > . As a

Re: [Wikitech-l] productivity of mediawiki developers

2016-04-03 Thread Federico Leva (Nemo)
For statistics, see https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Development_statistics . As a starting point to look into what you call "productivity", I usually use: * https://www.openhub.net/orgs/wikimedia * http://koti.kapsi.fi/~federico/crstats/core.txt +

Re: [Wikitech-l] productivity of mediawiki developers

2016-04-02 Thread Pine W
opers <wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org> > Betreff: [Wikitech-l] productivity of mediawiki developers > > hi, > > is there a statistics about mediawiki developer productivity? i just fell > over a couple of pages and i am quite impressed i must say: > * gabriel, https://githu

Re: [Wikitech-l] productivity of mediawiki developers

2016-04-02 Thread Pine W
Perhaps some Working Wikipedian and Tireless Contributor barnstars are appropriate for that group! Pine On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 12:06 PM, rupert THURNER wrote: > hi, > > is there a statistics about mediawiki developer productivity? i just > fell over a couple of pages

Re: [Wikitech-l] productivity of mediawiki developers

2016-04-02 Thread Florian Schmidt
[mailto:wikitech-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] Im Auftrag von rupert THURNER Gesendet: Samstag, 2. April 2016 21:06 An: Wikimedia developers <wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org> Betreff: [Wikitech-l] productivity of mediawiki developers hi, is there a statistics about mediawiki developer produc

[Wikitech-l] productivity of mediawiki developers

2016-04-02 Thread rupert THURNER
hi, is there a statistics about mediawiki developer productivity? i just fell over a couple of pages and i am quite impressed i must say: * gabriel, https://github.com/gwicke, 2'300 commits last year * jeroen, https://github.com/JeroenDeDauw, 3'700 commits a year * ori, https://github.com/atdt,