quote name=Greg Grossmeier date=2015-05-28 time=12:18:07 -0700
See also:
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/maniphest/?statuses=open%28%29projects=PHID-PROJ-4uc7r7pdosfsk55qg7f6#R
(aka: open tasks filed in the #Wikimedia-log-errors project on
phabricator)
A maybe better way to view that query:
quote name=Mukunda Modell date=2015-05-28 time=13:42:50 -0500
This also means we need to be even more diligent about policing the error
logs and eliminating noise which obscures real problems by burying them
among the other log messages.
+1000
See also:
On May 28, 2015 4:21 PM, Jon Robson jdlrob...@gmail.com wrote:
I suspect the idea is to lean more on our quality assurance infrastructure
e.g. browser tests which I fully welcome.
The more developed they become the less chance of regressions making it to
code let alone our projects.
When I
Awesome! This will make many teams very happy since they'll be moving
faster.
What's the criteria by which you will evaluate the success of this?
Thanks,
Dan
On 27 May 2015 10:19 pm, Greg Grossmeier g...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi all,
Starting the week of June 8th we'll be transitioning our
I suspect the idea is to lean more on our quality assurance infrastructure
e.g. browser tests which I fully welcome.
The more developed they become the less chance of regressions making it to
code let alone our projects.
When I joined 3 years ago we had no quality assurance infrastructure and
This is strictly a question from an uninvolved observer. Does this
schedule provide for sufficient time and real-time/hands-on testing before
changes hit the big projects?
An IRC discussion I was following last evening suggested to me that the
first deploy (to test wikis and mw.org) probably did
quote name=Dan Garry date=2015-05-28 time=13:51:47 +0200
Awesome! This will make many teams very happy since they'll be moving
faster.
:)
What's the criteria by which you will evaluate the success of this?
1) the above (happier teams)
2) It's going to be hard to measure success but it'll be
quote name=Risker date=2015-05-28 time=09:53:31 -0400
This is strictly a question from an uninvolved observer. Does this
schedule provide for sufficient time and real-time/hands-on testing before
changes hit the big projects?
Yes. We still have Beta Cluster (production-like environment) which
This is super awesome Greg. Thanks for making this happen. The deployment
schedule has always been a huge source of pain for me.
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:19 PM, Greg Grossmeier g...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
Hi all,
Starting the week of June 8th we'll be transitioning our MediaWiki +
Extensions
quote name=S Page date=2015-05-27 time=14:58:16 -0700
Benito, Grossmeier! He made the trains run on time [1]
Tuesday: New branch cut, deployed to test wikis
and mediawiki.org as before, I assume.
right right, I just mentally lump mw.org with test wikis ;)
--
| Greg Grossmeier
Benito, Grossmeier! He made the trains run on time [1]
Tuesday: New branch cut, deployed to test wikis
and mediawiki.org as before, I assume.
[1] Or not, http://www.transportmyths.co.uk/mussolini.htm
--
=S Page WMF Tech writer
___
Wikitech-l
11 matches
Mail list logo
