160 W measured at what point, before or after they're converted to the
end tension needed? PSU performance deteriorates a lot at low usage
ratio and their stock PSU is not particularly brilliant. But yes, it's
easy to reach 140 W just with one hard disk, some RAM sticks and a few
non-disabled
I wrote:
But I think
it would make more sense to have a bare metal provisioning process for
misc servers which allowed smaller numbers of Intel cores per server,
where that fits the application. That would improve energy efficiency
without the need to deploy a new architecture.
Actually,
Eugene wrote:
... OS support if not mature yet, especially for ARMv8 (64 bit).
Does someone have an exhaustive list of packages which we depend on
for production but aren't available as arm binaries yet? We could try
to build those.
As for development, I understand that Oracle's JDK isn't on
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 05:47:12PM +0800, James Salsman wrote:
Can someone more familiar with the Foundation's server infrastructure
needs than I please create a page somewhere with a checklist of
packages, modules, tools, etc., which need to be on arm but aren't
yet?
Before we do that, we
On 01/13/2014 04:47 AM, James Salsman wrote:
Can someone more familiar with the Foundation's server infrastructure
needs than I please create a page somewhere with a checklist of
packages, modules, tools, etc., which need to be on arm but aren't
yet? Jasper mentioned that we need virtualization
On 13/01/14 21:14, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
We've thought a bit about it in the past, but couldn't come up with a
use case that made technical or financial sense. We have dozens of x86
servers e.g. just for MediaWiki; having thousands of ARM servers for
the same purpose instead doesn't sound
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
In fact, it would slow down individual requests by a factor of 7,
judging by the benchmarks of Calxeda and Xeon CPUs at
http://www.eembc.org/coremark/index.php
So instead of a 10s parse time, you would have 70s.
On 14/01/14 10:55, George Herbert wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
In fact, it would slow down individual requests by a factor of 7,
judging by the benchmarks of Calxeda and Xeon CPUs at
http://www.eembc.org/coremark/index.php
So instead of
Hi!
I think will be good idea to try to get access to real hardware.
For example, Boston (http://www.boston.co.uk) produces Calxeda-based
servers and well as HP has experimental Calxeda and X-Gene based
cartridges for Moonshot servers (http://www.hp.com/moonshot).
Both provide remote access to
On Jan 14, 2014 2:47 AM, Eugene Zelenko eugene.zele...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
I think will be good idea to try to get access to real hardware.
For example, Boston (http://www.boston.co.uk) produces Calxeda-based
servers and well as HP has experimental Calxeda and X-Gene based
cartridges for
Hi!
ARM servers is definitely worth to look at, but please be aware that
technology is not mainstream and sad things may happens:
http://calxeda.com (one of exhibitors of ARM TechCon).
OS support if not mature yet, especially for ARMv8 (64 bit).
Eugene.
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 1:05 AM, James
11 matches
Mail list logo
