Re: [Wikitech-l] Phabricator was down for a short time today (April 4th)

2016-04-15 Thread Mukunda Modell
Indeed, Jaime, I think that will be possible very soon. The upstream task I linked to previously (https://secure.phabricator.com/T10751) is about two things: 1. properly handling clustered databases, especially dealing with read-only slaves 2. Implementing replicated git hosting, where

Re: [Wikitech-l] Phabricator was down for a short time today (April 4th)

2016-04-14 Thread Jaime Crespo
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 10:26 PM, Mukunda Modell wrote: > Phabricator is gaining improved high-availability support thanks to recent > work upstream, so it might be possible to have dual-master phabricator > nodes in the near future. See

Re: [Wikitech-l] Phabricator was down for a short time today (April 4th)

2016-04-14 Thread Mukunda Modell
I would like to see Phabricator move to a virtual owed cluster, or even a bare metal cluster. However, I would not include Phabricator in a list of "not-so-resource-consuming services." Phabricator definitely uses significant amount of resources. It's running on a 12 core server with 64gb ram and

Re: [Wikitech-l] Phabricator was down for a short time today (April 4th)

2016-04-04 Thread Ricordisamoa
Cool down, Phab. Cool down. We need you. Il 04/04/2016 19:57, Greg Grossmeier ha scritto: Apologies for not sending out this announcement before hand. Short summary: The machine that Phabricator is hosted on rebooted itself last night due to high temperatures. It ended up just shutting itself

Re: [Wikitech-l] Phabricator was down for a short time today (April 4th)

2016-04-04 Thread Alex Monk
Yeah... It also still mentions mchenry. I marked it as outdated. On 4 April 2016 at 19:24, Vituzzu wrote: > Uhm, tech still lists OTRS on iodine, which seems to be decommissioned. I > had a look at >

Re: [Wikitech-l] Phabricator was down for a short time today (April 4th)

2016-04-04 Thread Vituzzu
Uhm, tech still lists OTRS on iodine, which seems to be decommissioned. I had a look at http://ganglia.wikimedia.org/latest/?r=year===cpu_report=Miscellaneous+eqiad=iridium.eqiad.wmnet=m==false=2=medium_group=NOGROUPS and...well fairly busy but still "packable", though I'll let more

Re: [Wikitech-l] Phabricator was down for a short time today (April 4th)

2016-04-04 Thread Alex Monk
Actually I believe OTRS was moved into the ganeti VM cluster a couple of months ago. I'm not sure whether Phabricator is considered a not-so-resource-consuming service... On 4 April 2016 at 19:01, Vituzzu wrote: > Why not a small virtualised cluster for these

Re: [Wikitech-l] Phabricator was down for a short time today (April 4th)

2016-04-04 Thread Vituzzu
Why not a small virtualised cluster for these not-so-resource-consuming services like OTRS, phab, etc? /me runs away before writing the world-which-shouldn't be written Vito Il 04/04/2016 19:57, Greg Grossmeier ha scritto: Apologies for not sending out this announcement before hand. Short