I think I was not clear enough. I know the code is broken, and I know noone
should use it. I show it as a symptom of the system problem - wrong
precedence order implemented in the parser.
Igal
בתאריך יום ה׳, 13 בדצמ׳ 2018 ב-19:03 מאת Thiemo Kreuz <
thiemo.kr...@wikimedia.de>:
> > I
> I expect from the parser to parse wiki markup before parsing html tags […]
As I said. As neither the wiki markup nor the XML tags in the given
example are valid, one can't expect anything. Seriously. Code like
{{cite|}} is just broken. It's like having two nested Klein
bottles. Both structural
N3: The lonk you provides expects the transclusion (preprocessor 3.4)
before tags (processor 2.2). So the follow parameter behavior is broken.
Igal
בתאריך יום ה׳, 13 בדצמ׳ 2018 ב-18:25 מאת יגאל חיטרון <
khit...@post.bgu.ac.il>:
> The problem is the precedence, once again. I expect from the
The problem is the precedence, once again. I expect from the parser to
parse wiki markup before parsing html tags, because templates can create
new tags by transclusion. If the ref tag is parsed first, glueing the
unbalanced parts to one proper template call, that means that (1) the
template can't
The wikitext snippet you posted appears to be seriously broken. More
precisely: It is unbalanced. Technically, there is no such thing as
"broken" wikitext. The parser will always output something (as he does
in the example). However, this doesn't mean such wikitext is ok. Sure,
nobody is stopping
Thank you.
But even so, what about the weird order of precedence? I really do not like
that this code actually works:
text1{{citetext3|title=google|url=
http://google.com}}text5
Or it's implemented like this in purpose?
Igal
בתאריך יום ה׳, 13 בדצמ׳ 2018 ב-12:58 מאת Thiemo Kreuz <
> […] why the tag parameter follow= is not turned off in wiki sites that
> are not wikisource?
As the Technical Wishes team at Wikimedia Germany is currently working
on the Cite extension, I had a look to find an answer to your
question.
The follow="…" feature was introduced in 2010[1] as part
Presumably because it is part of Extension:Cite, not part of
Extension:Proofread; and the two extensions operate individually, and
Cite is independent of any particular wiki.
-- billinghurst
-- Original Message --
From: "יגאל חיטרון"
To: "Wikimedia developers"
Sent: 13/12/2018
