On 3/29/09 3:32 AM, private musings wrote:
Because I'm an idiot, I tried to send this before subscribing to this
particular list. I don't have high hopes of understanding much herein,
but hope the below is clear :-)
It's all in the queue; further code and UI cleanup is ongoing.
-- brion
Also note that the 'patrolled revisions' aspect is particularly messy to
implement. Some changes have been made but more are still needed to the
extension. I'm tempted to split off patrolling into its own code other
tables.
-Aaron
--
From: Brion
2009/3/30 Aaron Schulz jschulz_4...@msn.com:
Also note that the 'patrolled revisions' aspect is particularly messy to
implement. Some changes have been made but more are still needed to the
extension.
Could you elaborate a bit?
Thanks,
Erik
--
Erik Möller
Deputy Director, Wikimedia
Aryeh Gregor wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
Sending it only to SPF-verified addresses wouldn't be hard, would it?
(I must admit I have no idea how widespread SPF use is.)
Well, inbox.org doesn't seem to have it enabled, so I guess you'd be out. :)
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Aryeh Gregor
simetrical+wikil...@gmail.comsimetrical%2bwikil...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
Sending it only to SPF-verified addresses wouldn't be hard, would it?
(I must admit I have no idea how
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Brion Vibber br...@wikimedia.org wrote:
If we could have it only send sorry mails on non-spam mails, that
probably would be nice. Hopefully some day we can get there. :)
Sending it only to
